Radar‐based quantitative precipitation estimation over Mediterranean and dry climate regimes

Abstract

[1] Quantitative precipitation estimation based on meteorological radar data potentially provides continuous, high-resolution, large-coverage data that are essential for meteorological and hydrologic analyses. While intense scientific efforts have focused on precipitation estimation in temperate climatic regimes, relatively few studies examined radar-based estimates in dry climatic regions. The paper examines radar-based rain depth estimation for rainfall periods (a series of successive rainy days) in Israel, where the climate ranges between Mediterranean to dry. Three radar-gauge adjustment methods are compared: a one-coefficient bulk adjustment, which simply removes the mean bias; a two-coefficient range adjustment based on a weighted regression (WR); and a four-coefficient adjustment based on a weighted multiple regression (WMR), which assumes a locally varied, nonisotropic correction factor. The WMR technique has been previously applied in the Alps of Europe. Adjustment coefficients have been derived for 28 rainfall periods using 59 independent gauges of a quality-checked training data set. The validation was based on an independent data set composed of gauges located in eleven 20 Â 20 km 2 validation areas, which are representative of different climate, topography and radar distance conditions. The WR and WMR methods were found preferable with a slight better performance of the latter. Furthermore, a novel approach has been adopted in this study, whereby radar estimates are considered useable if they provide information that is better than gauge-only estimates. The latter was derived by spatial interpolation of the gauges belonging to the training data set. Note that these gauges are outside the validation areas. As for the radar-adjusted estimates, gauge-derived estimates were assessed against gauge data in the validation areas. It was found that radar-based estimates are better for the validation areas at the dry climate regime. At distances larger than 100 km, the radar underestimation becomes too large in the two northern validation areas, while in the southern one radar data are still better than gauge interpolation. It is concluded that in ungauged areas of Israel it is preferable to use WMR-adjusted (or alternatively, simply WR-adjusted) radar echoes rather than the standard bulk adjustment method and for dry ungauged areas it is preferable over the conventional gauge-interpolated values derived from point measurements, which are outside the areas themselves. The WR and WMR adjustment methods provide useful rain depth estimates for rainfall periods for the examined areas but within the limitation stated above.Citation: Morin, E., and M. Gabella (2007), Radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation over Mediterranean and dry climate regimes,

Validation of satellite daily rainfall estimates in complex terrain of Bali Island, Indonesia

“…Large, if not the largest problem in comparing satellite rainfall with the rainfall measured by gauges, is the scale difference between the two types of measurements, i.e., large spatial scale in the case of satellite rainfall products and small, in the case of rain gauges. A rain gauge measurement represents rainfall estimate at the local scale, limited to~200 m 2 coverage (Morin and Gabella 2007), while the satellite-pixel rainfall is a regional rainfall estimate with spatial coverage in order of tenths of km 2 (e.g., CMORPH 8 ) or even hundreds of km 2 (CMORPH 25 or TRMM). For example, in pixel 3, six rain gauges represent in total rainfall area of~1200 m 2 , while satellite rainfall estimated within a pixel represents an area of 729 km 2 .…”

A framework for assessing hydrological regime sensitivity to climate change in a convective rainfall environment: a case study of two medium-sized eastern Mediterranean catchments, Israel

“…Daily rainfall data from 26 rain gauges within 100 km distance from the radar were used for the radar-gauge adjustment and another 13 rain gauges in the surroundings of the Dalya and Taninim catchments were used for validation (Peleg and Morin, 2012). Rainfall data were initially calculated using the weather radar reflectivity data by applying a fixed reflectivity-rainfall power law relationship and then readjusted for each year using the weighted regression method (Gabella et al, 2001;Morin and Gabella, 2007). The model was constructed for four and five sub-basins for the upper Dalya and upper Taninim catchments, respectively.…”

An Improved QPE over Complex Terrain Employing Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Occurrences

“…Rain gauge measurements can be very accurate, but maintenance and calibration problems often result in poor data quality (e.g., Habib and Krajewski 2002;Morin and Gabella 2007;Villarini et al 2008). The lack of dense networks often requires the use of geostatistical methods to estimate areal precipitation, which, in most cases, have considerable deficiencies (Brandes et al 1999;Habib and Krajewski 2002;Morin and Gabella 2007;Villarini et al 2008).…”

“…The lack of dense networks often requires the use of geostatistical methods to estimate areal precipitation, which, in most cases, have considerable deficiencies (Brandes et al 1999;Habib and Krajewski 2002;Morin and Gabella 2007;Villarini et al 2008). Weather radars appear to be the best operational tool for precipitation estimation (Doswell et al 1996;Krajewski and Smith 2002;Morin et al 2005) because of their high spatiotemporal resolution and coverage. However, their precipitation measurements are affected by several factors, such as a varying Z-R relationship, topography blockage, evaporation of rain falling from relatively higher altitudes, and, for radars with nondual polarization, overestimation of precipitation due to the bright band (Crosson et al 1996;Fulton 1999;Krajewski and Smith 2002;Morin et al 2005).…”