2018 IEEE Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Signal Integrity and Power Integrity (EMC, SI &Amp; PI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/emcsi.2018.8495217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar Cross Sections of Objects with Simulated Defects Using the Parallel FDTD Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test chamber is a dual reflector setup with a reflector antenna of length 15 ft, width 8 ft, and height 6 ft with the frequency range of up to 20 GHz. Inside the test chamber, the supporting structure on which the aircraft model is mounted is made of Styrofoam which has a very low RCS [5, 7]. The walls of the test chamber are also shielded with broadband RF absorbers, giving an ideal environment for far‐field measurement without EM noise and interference.…”
Section: Model Fabrication and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The test chamber is a dual reflector setup with a reflector antenna of length 15 ft, width 8 ft, and height 6 ft with the frequency range of up to 20 GHz. Inside the test chamber, the supporting structure on which the aircraft model is mounted is made of Styrofoam which has a very low RCS [5, 7]. The walls of the test chamber are also shielded with broadband RF absorbers, giving an ideal environment for far‐field measurement without EM noise and interference.…”
Section: Model Fabrication and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations become more intricate when computing radar cross‐section (RCS) of electrically large objects such as aircrafts, ships, and missiles, as it involves the full wave solution of the electromagnetic field integral [4–6]. To cater for such complexities, various algorithms have been developed over a period of time including finite‐difference time‐domain method [7], method of moments (MoMs) [5], physical optics (PO) [8], and shooting and bouncing rays (SBR) [9]. The choice of these algorithms depends upon few major factors such as target size relative to the radar wavelength, accuracy, and computational time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%