1998
DOI: 10.1029/1998gl900033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications

Abstract: Abstract. The use of SAR interferometry is often impeded by decorrelation from thermal noise, temporal change, and baseline geometry. Power spectra of interferograms are typically the stun of a narrow-band component combined with broad-band noise. We describe a new adaptive filtering algorith•n that dramatically lowers phase noise, i•nproving both measurement accuracy and phase unwrapping, while demonstrating graceful degradation in regions of pure noise. The performance of the filter is demonstrated with SAR … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
965
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,780 publications
(970 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
965
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we retrieved a network of 664 differential SAR interferograms (see figure 1), which were computed by performing a complex multi-look operation with 4 looks in the range direction and 20 looks in the azimuth one (Bamler and Hartl 1998, Rosen et 2000, Lanari et al 2007), leading to a resulting pixel dimension of about 100 m × 100 m. For the interferogram generation (Gabriel et al 1989), the topographic phase contributions were removed by using precise satellite orbit information and a threearcsecond shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) of the region. The multi-look interferograms were also pre-filtered by applying the well-known approach described in Goldstein and Werner (1998), and subsequently processed by following the lines of the filtering approach described in the previous section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, we retrieved a network of 664 differential SAR interferograms (see figure 1), which were computed by performing a complex multi-look operation with 4 looks in the range direction and 20 looks in the azimuth one (Bamler and Hartl 1998, Rosen et 2000, Lanari et al 2007), leading to a resulting pixel dimension of about 100 m × 100 m. For the interferogram generation (Gabriel et al 1989), the topographic phase contributions were removed by using precise satellite orbit information and a threearcsecond shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM) of the region. The multi-look interferograms were also pre-filtered by applying the well-known approach described in Goldstein and Werner (1998), and subsequently processed by following the lines of the filtering approach described in the previous section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the fringes depicted on the left side of figure 2 represent a selection of original interferograms after multi-look operation and additional noise-filtering based on Goldstein and Werner (1998) on the right side we portray the corresponding reconstructed fringes. By comparing the homologous interferograms of figure 2, it is evident the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interferograms were unwrapped using the SNAPHU algorithm (Chen and Zebker, 2000) to obtain line-of-sight (LOS) displacements with Goldstein filtering (Goldstein and Werner, 1998).…”
Section: Coseismic Interferogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the effects of the decorrelation noise, we also independently carried out (on each single interferogram) a complex multilook operation [60] (with 30 looks in the azimuth and range directions for the CSK case, and with 20 looks in the azimuth, and 4 looks in the range direction for the ASAR/ENVISAT case, thus resulting, for both SAR datasets, in a radar pixel dimension of about 90 × 90 m). To each interferogram, a noise-filtering operation [61,62] was also applied. A selection of four interferograms, characterized by different values of the spatial and temporal baselines, is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Sbas-dinsar Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%