2006
DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200603000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radial Optic Neurotomy for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Abstract: Surgical decompression of CRVO via RON is a technically feasible and safe procedure that was associated with anatomical resolution of CRVO in 95% patients and improved visual function in 71%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported variable visual improvement after RON ranging from none to 5 lines of vision [6, 7, 18,20,21,22,23, 26, 27]. Possible explanations for such differences may relate to case selection (differing number of patients and inclusion criteria) and study design (retrospective, different follow-up).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported variable visual improvement after RON ranging from none to 5 lines of vision [6, 7, 18,20,21,22,23, 26, 27]. Possible explanations for such differences may relate to case selection (differing number of patients and inclusion criteria) and study design (retrospective, different follow-up).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large-scale study which evaluated the outcomes of RON in 117 patients with severe CRVO, anatomic resolution was reported in 95% of patients, and visual improvement in 71% within 3 months postoperatively [117]. …”
Section: Surgical Approaches To Treating Rvomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some surgeons have also reported successful results with radial optic neurotomy (RON), but complications of the procedure have been reported. Opremcak et al[21,22,23] reported anatomic resolution of CRVO in 92–95% of 180 patients following RON with associated improvement in VA. Binder et al [24] found clinically relevant improvements on a long-term follow-up with RON; patients with nonischemic CRVO may respond more favorably than patients with ischemic CRVO. But when comparing both procedures, Yamamoto et al [25] concluded that although there was no significant difference in surgical outcomes between the two procedures, the therapies with tPA cannulation or RON alone were inadequate, because an additional treatment was necessary.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macular grid photocoagulation is an effective treatment to improve vision, but only for BRVO macular edema [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In CRVO, even if the treatment clearly reduces angiographic evidence of macular edema, macular grid photocoagulation results in no VA improvement [33].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%