1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02410284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation conditions near the sunken submarine “Komsomolets”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate change impacts on objects containing radioactive material sunken or accidentally lost at sea For a discussion of CC impacts on radioactive material from accidents and losses that have already been released into the marine environment (e.g., the accident at Thule (see Box 5)), refer to the relevant section on CC impacts on secondary sources. In other situations, it is difficult to see that the observed and projected CC impacts would have any notable impact either where releases of radionuclides to the marine environment have yet to be observed (e.g., K-159 66 ) or in the case of Komsomolets where releases from the reactor have been ongoing for over 30 years [67][68][69][70] (see Box 5). Nevertheless, as mentioned for dumped waste, the issue of corrosion rates may need to be considered in these situations.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Climate change impacts on objects containing radioactive material sunken or accidentally lost at sea For a discussion of CC impacts on radioactive material from accidents and losses that have already been released into the marine environment (e.g., the accident at Thule (see Box 5)), refer to the relevant section on CC impacts on secondary sources. In other situations, it is difficult to see that the observed and projected CC impacts would have any notable impact either where releases of radionuclides to the marine environment have yet to be observed (e.g., K-159 66 ) or in the case of Komsomolets where releases from the reactor have been ongoing for over 30 years [67][68][69][70] (see Box 5). Nevertheless, as mentioned for dumped waste, the issue of corrosion rates may need to be considered in these situations.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, environmental investigations at the USS Thresher and USS Scorpion wreck sites concluded that there had been no discernible effect on the ambient levels of radioactivity 253 . Of the remaining two submarines, releases of radionuclides have only been observed from Komsomolets (K-278), which lies in the Norwegian Sea at a depth of 1700 m. The estimated reactor inventory in 2020 would have decreased to ~3 PBq, but with a further 16 TBq of plutonium in the two nuclear warheads housed within the torpedo compartment 67,69 . Releases from the submarine's reactor were detected shortly after it sank in 1989 and as recently as 2019 [67][68][69] .…”
Section: Historic Contamination From Previous Discharges From Nonnucl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the concentration of technogenic radionuclides also decreases gradual- ly in the bottom deposits in the Zalivs Abrosimova and Stepovogo ( Table 4). The results of numerous marine expeditions show that the concentration of technogenic radionuclides near the sunken submarines does not differ from the background level due to global fallout [11,12]. The technogenic irradiation dose to the Arctic biota (phyto-and zooplankton, crustaceans, mollusks, macrophytes, fish, and sea birds) for these conditions where estimated by the methods described in IAEA recommendations.…”
Section: Discharge Of Radioactive Wastes By Plants In Great Britain Amentioning
confidence: 99%