2003
DOI: 10.1051/epjap:2003060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation damage in ion-irradiated yttria-stabilized cubic zirconia single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
32
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…They indicate that: (i) small defect clusters, which lead to a strong increase of the elastic strain, are created during the first step; (ii) the second step is due to the formation of perfect dislocation loops and of a network of tangled dislocations, inducing a relaxation of the elastic strain and a sharp increase of f D ; (iii) long dislocations, which induce a reorganization of the crystal (decrease of f D ), are exhibited in step 3. A similar behavior (except step 3) was observed in cubic zirconia irradiated with a large variety of low-energy ions [22,23], leading to the conclusion that the number of dpa is the key parameter for the evolution of the damage build-up in the nuclear collision regime. Multi-step damage accumulation processes were also reported in other non-amorphizable ceramics (for instance spinel, magnesium oxide and uranium dioxide) irradiated at low energy [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Effects Of Elastic Collisions At Low Energysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…They indicate that: (i) small defect clusters, which lead to a strong increase of the elastic strain, are created during the first step; (ii) the second step is due to the formation of perfect dislocation loops and of a network of tangled dislocations, inducing a relaxation of the elastic strain and a sharp increase of f D ; (iii) long dislocations, which induce a reorganization of the crystal (decrease of f D ), are exhibited in step 3. A similar behavior (except step 3) was observed in cubic zirconia irradiated with a large variety of low-energy ions [22,23], leading to the conclusion that the number of dpa is the key parameter for the evolution of the damage build-up in the nuclear collision regime. Multi-step damage accumulation processes were also reported in other non-amorphizable ceramics (for instance spinel, magnesium oxide and uranium dioxide) irradiated at low energy [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Effects Of Elastic Collisions At Low Energysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Although He and Xe ion fluences are very close, leading to almost identical noble-gas concentrations in the implanted layer in both cases, this result can be accounted for by the huge difference in the energy deposited in nuclear collisions, leading to very different number of dpa created by incoming ions (Table 1). In a recent paper Thomé et al measured, by Rutherford backscattering and channeling (RBS/C) experiments, the damage accumulated in cubic yttria-stabilized zirconia single crystals (structure isomorphic of the UO 2 one) irradiated with various noble-gas ions [23]. The results show the presence of several disordering stages scaled with the number of dpa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information on how these results were obtained is given in Ref. [19]. This disordering kinetic exhibits three stages: (i) a first plateau characterized by a very low damage level at low dpa (i.e., low fluences); (ii) a sharp rise of f Zr D at 3 dpa and (iii) a slowly rising plateau above 4 dpa.…”
Section: Damage Induced By Cs Ion Implantationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our previous RBS work [9,19] the amount of damage (f Zr D ) created in the Zr sublattice of YSZ crystals by Cs irradiation was Dark-field TEM micrographs showing the damage evolution of YSZ single crystals implanted at room temperature with 70 keV Cs ions at a fluence of (a) 2 Â 10 14 cm À2 (0.6 dpa); (b) 3 Â 10 14 cm À2 (0.9 dpa); (c) 10 15 cm À2 (3.1 dpa); (d) 4 Â 10 15 cm À2 (12.2 dpa) and (e) 10 16 cm À2 (30.5 dpa). Diffraction patterns are shown in inset for each fluence.…”
Section: Damage Induced By Cs Ion Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%