Site Characterization and Aggregation of Implanted Atoms in Materials 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-1015-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Effects in Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the migration energies for interstitials ε m i = 0.12 eV, 16 vacancies ε m v = 0.7 eV, 17 and Ar interstitials ε m Ar = 0.7 eV 18 , all three types of the simplest defects are mobile already at 300 K, i.e., without sample annealing.…”
Section: Model a General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the migration energies for interstitials ε m i = 0.12 eV, 16 vacancies ε m v = 0.7 eV, 17 and Ar interstitials ε m Ar = 0.7 eV 18 , all three types of the simplest defects are mobile already at 300 K, i.e., without sample annealing.…”
Section: Model a General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure vacancies in copper are already mobile below room temperature, and the experimental estimate for the migration energy is about 0.72 eV [15], based on the assumption that the stage III recovery is caused by vacancy migration. We calculated the vacancy migration energy in bulk by moving a nearest copper atom from a lattice site to a vacant site by small steps.…”
Section: Vacancy Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%