1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(06)80071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposure during ERCP: effect of a protective shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some factors, such as type of equipment, namely, fixed units versus portable C-arm units, have been shown to have a large impact on radiation dose but are not readily modifiable in an established endoscopy unit [14]. The radiation beam can be adjusted to utilize the lowest effective voltage required to produce a clinically useful image, and shielding of patients and staff with either permanent (walls or barriers) or portable (drapes, aprons) mechanisms also effectively reduces exposure [4,8,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some factors, such as type of equipment, namely, fixed units versus portable C-arm units, have been shown to have a large impact on radiation dose but are not readily modifiable in an established endoscopy unit [14]. The radiation beam can be adjusted to utilize the lowest effective voltage required to produce a clinically useful image, and shielding of patients and staff with either permanent (walls or barriers) or portable (drapes, aprons) mechanisms also effectively reduces exposure [4,8,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be employed during interventions to confirm the position of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic devices [1]. As with all fluoroscopic procedures, ERCP carries the risk of exposure of patients and staff to radiation [2][3][4][5]. High doses of ionizing radiation may have a deleterious impact on health [6]; therefore, minimizing exposure to patients and staff is recommended [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3,4,12,13 When physician doses were serially measured, endoscopists were found to be exposed to larger amounts of radiation than their assistants because the endoscopists were typically closer to the x-ray sources. 1 Some factors, such as the type of equipment (ie, by using fixed units vs portable C-arm units) have been shown to reduce radiation dose but unfortunately are not easily implemented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3,4,12,13 When physician doses were serially measured, endoscopists were found to be exposed to larger amounts of radiation than their assistants because the endoscopists were typically closer to the x-ray sources. 1 Some factors, such as the type of equipment (ie, by using fixed units vs portable C-arm units) have been shown to reduce radiation dose but unfortunately are not easily implemented. 14 The radiation beam can be adjusted to use the lowest effective voltage required to produce a clinically useful image, and shielding of patients and staff 1,13 with either permanent (walls or barriers) or portable (drapes, aprons) mechanisms has also been shown to effectively reduce exposure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies have either been on various interventional radiology procedures including ERCP [9,11,16,21], relatively old studies focusing on protective measures [13,32], or phantom studies [18,22]. Such studies were undertaken at different periods and with different fluoroscopy devices (fixed X-ray source situated either under or above the patient bed vs. C-arm devices).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%