In this issue of the EJNMMI, Spadafora et al. propose shortening the FDG PET/CT acquisition for evaluating a solitary pulmonary nodule. The rationale is to design a strategy with a better cost-effectiveness ratio. There is a lot to like in the paper, as it discusses various aspects highly relevant to clinical nuclear medicine, such as clinical impact, patients' selection, imaging methodology, radiation safety, and costs. The objective is quite ambitious, as the proposed strategy could increase the number of FDG PET/CT performed for characterizing lung nodules, improve its effectiveness while reducing the cost and the radiation burden, and finally, increase the diagnostic accuracy. While some of these objectives may very well be achieved through this new strategy, it appears difficult to reach all, and there remain many question marks preventing the straight passage from the idea to the routine implementation.The first issue is the patient's selection. The current guidelines essentially use two criteria for deciding whether FDG PET/CT is indicated: the size of the nodule and the pre-test probability. It is important to note that the strategies discussed here exclusively concern solid nodules. FDG PET/CT should be performed for characterizing nodules > 8 mm in diameter with a pretest probability of malignancy that is low to moderate (5-65 %) [1] or ≥ 10 % [2]. The European guidelines are more complex, as it is recommended that indeterminate SPNs should be assessed, in light of all relevant information, including patient, epidemiological and procedure-related factors by expert multidisciplinary boards who will apply criteria such as those proposed by the Fleischner Society, which recommends considering PET in lesions > 8 mm [3,4]. In patients with a very high risk of cancer, the indication becomes staging rather than characterization [1]. Spadafora et al. imply that wholebody imaging is not indicated in T1 tumours, thanks to the low incidence of distant metastases in these early-stage lesions. This contradicts every international guideline for staging lung cancer [5][6][7], including small-cell lung cancer [8]. Indeed, even though lung cancer is increasingly diagnosed at an earlier stage, the majority of NSCLC patients have distant metastases at the time of diagnosis [9]. Even though the occurrence and distribution of distant metastases may occur following specific patterns, it remains practically impossible to predict such occurrence in individual patients [10]. Even in T1 tumors, the incidence of metastases is not negligible, as M1 disease has been reported in 13-14 % of the cases [11,12]. It is of primary importance that these patients are correctly identified in order to receive the optimal treatment, which may lead to prolonged survival in a subgroup presenting with synchronous oligometatastic NSCLC, i.e. with maximum five metastatic lesions [13]. PET/CT won't recognize all distant lesions, in particular the brain is not appropriately explored with PET alone. However, although the exact figure of extracerebral...