2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation exposures of cancer patients from medical X-rays: How relevant are they for individual patients and population exposure?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective dose of 40 mSv among patients with acute pancreatitis 1 is identical to that reported for patients with pancreatic cancer during their first year (40.1 mSv). 6 Unfortunately, patients with pancreatic cancer have substantially shorter life expectancy as evidenced by an overall 5-year exposure of only 68.8 mSv per patient. 6 Given the known challenge of recovering well enough from postoperative complications to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, it can easily be argued that the radiation exposure associated with multiple CT scans in this scenario is irrelevant from a stochastic standpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effective dose of 40 mSv among patients with acute pancreatitis 1 is identical to that reported for patients with pancreatic cancer during their first year (40.1 mSv). 6 Unfortunately, patients with pancreatic cancer have substantially shorter life expectancy as evidenced by an overall 5-year exposure of only 68.8 mSv per patient. 6 Given the known challenge of recovering well enough from postoperative complications to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, it can easily be argued that the radiation exposure associated with multiple CT scans in this scenario is irrelevant from a stochastic standpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Unfortunately, patients with pancreatic cancer have substantially shorter life expectancy as evidenced by an overall 5-year exposure of only 68.8 mSv per patient. 6 Given the known challenge of recovering well enough from postoperative complications to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, it can easily be argued that the radiation exposure associated with multiple CT scans in this scenario is irrelevant from a stochastic standpoint. When this concept is applied to our data set, the observed reduction in CT imaging over the study interval would have resulted in a theoretical reduction in the absolute number of patients who developed a radiation-induced fatal cancer per year of 3 for acute pancreatitis and 1 for both chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic neoplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In IGRT, CBCT imaging is repeatedly applied to a patient during the treatment course, leading to a clinical concern of excessive imaging dose. [4][5][6] IR algorithms, especially compressed sensing (CS)-based algorithms, have been shown to be capable of reconstructing CBCT images from noisy and undersampled x-ray projections, hence considerably reducing radiation dose during the CBCT scan.…”
Section: Cone-beam Ct (Cbct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] This change has also led to a nearly 6-fold increase in the per capita radiation exposure from medical imaging. [13][14][15][16] The primary goal of this study was therefore to evaluate the impact of implementing an ACS clinical care pathway dedicated to suspected appendicitis on the timing and use of CT and on patient flow through the emergency department (ED). The secondary objective was to compare patientrelated variables among 3 ACS-equipped medical centres within the Calgary region of Alberta Health Services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%