1993
DOI: 10.1109/23.273481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-induced charge effects in buried oxides with different processing treatments

Abstract: We characterize the radiation-induced charge trapping and transport propehes of the buried-oxide (BOX) layer using the photocurrent response technique and capacitance-voltage shift measurements for a variety of silicon-on-insulator (SOI) materials. We observe dramatic differences as a result of different BOX processing conditions. The radiation response of the SO1 as a whole is shown to be consistent with the basic properties of the material(s) contained in the BOX layer. In comparison to standard separation b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An electron trapping was assumed to explain the positive midgap voltage shifts at the top interface observed at low doses [ rad(SiO )] and high applied electric fields (1 mV/cm) for similar three-layer bond-and-etch structures containing the Si N [11], [12]. The low dose response of the SiO -Si N -SiO layers observed in the present study may also be attributed to the electron trapping in the Si N or at the Si N -SiO interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An electron trapping was assumed to explain the positive midgap voltage shifts at the top interface observed at low doses [ rad(SiO )] and high applied electric fields (1 mV/cm) for similar three-layer bond-and-etch structures containing the Si N [11], [12]. The low dose response of the SiO -Si N -SiO layers observed in the present study may also be attributed to the electron trapping in the Si N or at the Si N -SiO interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fabrication of SOI structures with a nitride interlayer in the buried insulator by the wafer bonding method has been reported in [11] and [12], but fabrication of thin silicon films (below 1 m in thickness) with good homogeneity and thickness uniformity using wafer bonding is rather costly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41][42] Even in the low-dose (D ϭ4ϫ10 17 O ϩ cm Ϫ2 ) SIMOX BOX where silicon inclusions are absent, the hole trapping probability remains at nearly 100% indicating that hole traps are related to oxide network imperfections. 14 The high-temperature annealing of thermally grown SiO 2 sandwiched between two silicon layers, such as in the BOX of bonded structures, 43,44 causes the hole trapping properties to be similar to those of the SIMOX BOX. It thus follows that it is the PIA in confined circumstances that generates a large density of hole traps in the oxide layer.…”
Section: Defects In the Buried Sio 2 Of Simox Structures: An Overmentioning
confidence: 95%