1981
DOI: 10.1016/0094-5765(81)90083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation: Risk and protection in manned space flight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Russian space agency (RSA) model started to be developed already in the 1960s and is a risk model that includes noncancer effects in the risk calculation, and even the impact of the space environment (microgravity) on the radiation effect [29][30][31]. The 1 Sv limit, agreed with the ISS partner in the Medical Operation Board, was actually chosen in an attempt to harmonize the limits with ESA, but it actually corresponds to an excess fatality risk (cancer + noncancer) around 7%, i.e., higher than the 3% recommended by NCRP to NASA.…”
Section: Rsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Russian space agency (RSA) model started to be developed already in the 1960s and is a risk model that includes noncancer effects in the risk calculation, and even the impact of the space environment (microgravity) on the radiation effect [29][30][31]. The 1 Sv limit, agreed with the ISS partner in the Medical Operation Board, was actually chosen in an attempt to harmonize the limits with ESA, but it actually corresponds to an excess fatality risk (cancer + noncancer) around 7%, i.e., higher than the 3% recommended by NCRP to NASA.…”
Section: Rsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation in space has been described as "the primary source of hazard for orbital and interplanetary space flight" (Petrov et al, 1981). The successful flights made by the United States and the Soviet Union prove clearly that comparatively brief flights, when there are no solar flares and when flight trajectories are carefully planned, do not present a radiation hazard for space crews.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Underlying Loss Of Red Blood Cell Massmentioning
confidence: 99%