2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation shielding, structural, physical, and optical properties for a series of borosilicate glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another significant parameter in the radiation shielding field is the tenth value layer (TVL), which is the material thickness needed to attenuate 10% of the initial incident gamma-ray intensity. As shown in Table 2, the half value layer (T1/2) values of the investigated S5 samples were compared with those of Glass1 (Cr2O3-doped BS glass) [40], Glass2 (obsidian glass doped with CeO2) [41], Glass3 (BaO-TiO2-SiO2-B2O3 glass) [42], Glass4 (Li2O-K2O-B2O3-PbO glass) [43], Glass5 (Li2O-K2O-B2O3-HMO (HMO = SrO/TeO2/PbO/Bi2O3)) [44], Glass6 (xBaO-(0.30-x) MgO-0.10Na2O-0.10Al2O3-0.50B2O3 glass) [45], and standard shielding materials (ordinary concrete: OC [46], and hematite-serpentine concrete: HSC [47]); the T1/2 values of the S5 samples were lower than those of all other samples, even OC and HSC. As shown in Table 2, the half value layer (T 1/2 ) values of the investigated S5 samples were compared with those of Glass1 (Cr 2 O 3 -doped BS glass) [40], Glass2 (obsidian glass doped with CeO 2 ) [41], Glass3 (BaO-TiO 2 -SiO 2 -B 2 O 3 glass) [42], Glass4 (Li 2 O-K 2 O-B 2 O 3 -PbO glass) [43], Glass5 (Li 2 O-K 2 O-B 2 O 3 -HMO (HMO = SrO/TeO 2 /PbO/Bi 2 O 3 )) [44], Glass6 (xBaO-(0.30-x) MgO-0.10Na 2 O-0.10Al 2 O 3 -0.50B 2 O 3 glass) [45], and standard shielding materials (ordinary concrete: OC [46], and hematite-serpentine concrete: HSC [47]); the T 1/2 values of the S5 samples were lower than those of all other samples, even OC and HSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another significant parameter in the radiation shielding field is the tenth value layer (TVL), which is the material thickness needed to attenuate 10% of the initial incident gamma-ray intensity. As shown in Table 2, the half value layer (T1/2) values of the investigated S5 samples were compared with those of Glass1 (Cr2O3-doped BS glass) [40], Glass2 (obsidian glass doped with CeO2) [41], Glass3 (BaO-TiO2-SiO2-B2O3 glass) [42], Glass4 (Li2O-K2O-B2O3-PbO glass) [43], Glass5 (Li2O-K2O-B2O3-HMO (HMO = SrO/TeO2/PbO/Bi2O3)) [44], Glass6 (xBaO-(0.30-x) MgO-0.10Na2O-0.10Al2O3-0.50B2O3 glass) [45], and standard shielding materials (ordinary concrete: OC [46], and hematite-serpentine concrete: HSC [47]); the T1/2 values of the S5 samples were lower than those of all other samples, even OC and HSC. As shown in Table 2, the half value layer (T 1/2 ) values of the investigated S5 samples were compared with those of Glass1 (Cr 2 O 3 -doped BS glass) [40], Glass2 (obsidian glass doped with CeO 2 ) [41], Glass3 (BaO-TiO 2 -SiO 2 -B 2 O 3 glass) [42], Glass4 (Li 2 O-K 2 O-B 2 O 3 -PbO glass) [43], Glass5 (Li 2 O-K 2 O-B 2 O 3 -HMO (HMO = SrO/TeO 2 /PbO/Bi 2 O 3 )) [44], Glass6 (xBaO-(0.30-x) MgO-0.10Na 2 O-0.10Al 2 O 3 -0.50B 2 O 3 glass) [45], and standard shielding materials (ordinary concrete: OC [46], and hematite-serpentine concrete: HSC [47]); the T 1/2 values of the S5 samples were lower than those of all other samples, even OC and HSC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be noted from Table 2 that the bandgap results increase gradually with the addition of the CdO to the glass system that ascribed to the formation of bridging oxygen in the glass structure. [28,29]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation ( 1), t represents the thickness of the sample, while I and I 0 in Equation ( 2) are the attenuated and incident intensities of the photons. Moreover, the half value thick-ness (HVL) represents the width of glass that able to shield half of the initial radiation [32]. The smaller the sample thickness that is able to provide adequate radiation protection, the better it will be used in practical applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%