Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models

Abstract

[1] A primary component of the observed recent climate change is the radiative forcing from increased concentrations of long-lived greenhouse gases (LLGHGs). Effective simulation of anthropogenic climate change by general circulation models (GCMs) is strongly dependent on the accurate representation of radiative processes associated with water vapor, ozone, and LLGHGs. In the context of the increasing application of the Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. (AER), radiation models within the GCM community, their capability to calculate longwave and shortwave radiative forcing for clear sky scenarios previously examined by the radiative transfer model intercomparison project (RTMIP) is presented. Forcing calculations with the AER line-by-line (LBL) models are very consistent with the RTMIP line-by-line results in the longwave and shortwave. The AER broadband models, in all but one case, calculate longwave forcings within a range of À0.20 to 0.23 W m À2 of LBL calculations and shortwave forcings within a range of À0.16 to 0.38 W m À2 of LBL results. These models also perform well at the surface, which RTMIP identified as a level at which GCM radiation models have particular difficulty reproducing LBL fluxes. Heating profile perturbations calculated by the broadband models generally reproduce high-resolution calculations within a few hundredths K d À1 in the troposphere and within 0.15 K d À1 in the peak stratospheric heating near 1 hPa. In most cases, the AER broadband models provide radiative forcing results that are in closer agreement with high-resolution calculations than the GCM radiation codes examined by RTMIP, which supports the application of the AER models to climate change research.

Influence of Terrain Resolution on Banded Convection in the Lee of the Rocky Mountains

“…For all simulations, the vertical grid consisted of 48 levels and was stretched such that its finest grid spacing (about 100 m) was in the boundary layer and gradually became coarser with height to a maximum grid spacing of about 1.5 km near the model top at about 20 km. The simulations also used the following schemes: Morrison et al's (2005) two-moment microphysics parameterization, the Yonsei University boundary layer parameterization (Hong et al 2006), the Noah land surface model (Chen and Dudhia 2001), and the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for GCMs (RRTMG; Iacono et al 2008).…”

Downslope Windstorms of San Diego County. Part I: A Case Study

“…The physics combination that consistently best represented the sustained wind observations over a set of events with respect to magnitude and temporal and spatial variation employed the Pleim-Xiu (PX; Pleim and Xiu 1995;Xiu and Pleim 2001) LSM and surface layer scheme, along with the Asymmetric Convection Model, version 2 (ACM2; Pleim 2007a,b) PBL parameterization. This ''standard'' configuration, labeled PX-ACM2, also utilized the MODIS land-use database, the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for General Circulation Models (RRTMG; Iacono et al 2008) radiation parameterization, and explicit horizontal diffusion was not applied. Neither the land-use nor diffusion choice had much impact on the results (Cao 2015) for this combination.…”

High-resolution dynamical downscaling of re-analysis data over the Kerguelen Islands using the WRF model

“…The radiation scheme used for both short-wave and long-wave radiation is the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for Global (RRTMG) models (Iacono et al 2008) with a spatially and temporally varying climatological aerosol distribution based on Tegen et al (1997) employed. Cumulus convection is parameterised using the Betts-Miller-Janjić (BMJ; Janjić 1994) scheme.…”