1982
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5087(82)90370-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative lifetimes of some energy levels of singly ionized neon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrumental resolution of their apparatus was 3 ns and therefore they could give for the first two states only an upper limit whereas in the present work the instrumental resolution is slightly better (2.4 ns) and therefore reliable data can be extracted for their two states. The experimental results of Fink et al [3] and Coetzer et al [5] obtained through beam-foil technique agree well with the [4] for the 3d 2 F 7/2 and 3d 2 F 7/2 levels are longer than the present results whereas for the 4s 4 P 5/2 level the lifetime value of Hesser [6] obtained through phase shift technique is almost half of the present value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The instrumental resolution of their apparatus was 3 ns and therefore they could give for the first two states only an upper limit whereas in the present work the instrumental resolution is slightly better (2.4 ns) and therefore reliable data can be extracted for their two states. The experimental results of Fink et al [3] and Coetzer et al [5] obtained through beam-foil technique agree well with the [4] for the 3d 2 F 7/2 and 3d 2 F 7/2 levels are longer than the present results whereas for the 4s 4 P 5/2 level the lifetime value of Hesser [6] obtained through phase shift technique is almost half of the present value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The calculations were done using a semiemperical method in intermediate coupling by Hodges et al [13] and Loginov and Gruzdev [14], and LS coupling by Coetzer et al [5] and Martin and Campos [15]. For the 3d 2 D 3/2 , 3d 2 D 5/2 , 3d 2 F 5/2 , 4s 2 D 3/2 and 4s 2 D 5/2 levels our results differ greatly from theoretical values.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation