Radiative transfer of acoustic waves in continuous complex media: Beyond the Helmholtz equation

Abstract

Heterogeneity can be accounted for by a random potential in the wave equation. For acoustic waves in a fluid with fluctuations of both density and compressibility (as well as for electromagnetic waves in a medium with fluctuation of both permittivity and permeability) the random potential entails a scalar and an operator contribution. For simplicity, the latter is usually overlooked in multiple scattering theory: whatever the type of waves, this simplification amounts to considering the Helmholtz equation with a sound speed c depending on position r. In this work, a radiative transfer equation is derived from the wave equation, in order to study energy transport through a multiple scattering medium. In particular, the influence of the operator term on various transport parameters is studied, based on the diagrammatic approach of multiple scattering. Analytical results are obtained for fundamental quantities of transport theory such as the transport mean-free path * , scattering phase function f , and anisotropy factor g. Discarding the operator term in the wave equation is shown to have a significant impact on f and g, yet limited to the low-frequency regime, i.e., when the correlation length of the disorder c is smaller than or comparable to the wavelength λ. More surprisingly, discarding the operator part has a significant impact on the transport mean-free path * whatever the frequency regime. When the scalar and operator terms have identical amplitudes, the discrepancy on the transport mean-free path is around 300% in the low-frequency regime, and still above 30% for c /λ = 10 3 no matter how weak fluctuations of the disorder are. Analytical results are supported by numerical simulations of the wave equation and Monte Carlo simulations.

On the weight of single and recurrent scattering in the reflection matrix of complex media

“…With no loss of generality, Eq. ( 5) also applies to less common cases: µ is then an operator and not a simple scalar [31,32]. The solution of Eq.…”

A Monte Carlo framework for rendering speckle statistics in scattering media

“…Most of these imaging techniques rely on the memory e ect of speckles, a fact that has motivated signi cant research on quantifying this e ect for di erent materials. Existing computational approaches generally a empt to derive closed-form expressions for the memory e ect (Akkermans and Montambaux 2007;Baydoun et al 2016;Berkovits and Feng 1994;Dougherty et al 1994;Freund and Eliyahu 1992;Fried 1982;Osnabrugge et al 2017). Unfortunately, these expressions only hold under assumptions such as di usion or the Fokker-Planck limits, restricting their applicability.…”

Rendering near-field speckle statistics in scattering media

“…Quantifying differences in speckle characteristics between the near-field and far-field cases can be done using analytical tools that approximate speckle statistics with closed-form mathematical expressions. Most available such tools are for the far-field case [Akkermans and Montambaux 2007;Baydoun et al 2016;Berkovits and Feng 1994;Dougherty et al 1994;Feng et al 1988;Freund and Eliyahu 1992;Fried 1982], though recently tools have been introduced for the near-field case [Judkewitz et al 2014;Osnabrugge et al 2017]. For example, Osnabrugge et al [2017] derived a tilt-shift model for the memory effect, assuming that the underlying scattering material is optically thin and very forward-scattering.…”