2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2018.8486456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical Analysis Network for Zero-Shot Learning in Printed Chinese Character Recognition

Abstract: Chinese characters have a huge set of character categories, more than 20,000 and the number is still increasing as more and more novel characters continue being created. However, the enormous characters can be decomposed into a compact set of about 500 fundamental and structural radicals. This paper introduces a novel radical analysis network (RAN) to recognize printed Chinese characters by identifying radicals and analyzing two-dimensional spatial structures among them. The proposed RAN first extracts visual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt a coverage based spatial attention model built in the decoder to detect the radicals and internal two-dimensional structures simultaneously [14], [15]. Compared with [18] focusing on printed Chinese character recognition, DenseRAN focuses on HCCR which is much more difficult due to the diversity of writing styles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt a coverage based spatial attention model built in the decoder to detect the radicals and internal two-dimensional structures simultaneously [14], [15]. Compared with [18] focusing on printed Chinese character recognition, DenseRAN focuses on HCCR which is much more difficult due to the diversity of writing styles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the training set contains 3255 character classes, TRAN achieves a character accuracy of 60.37% which is a relatively pleasant performance compared with traditional recognition systems as they can not recognize unseen Chinese character classes which means their accuracies are definitely 0%. The performance of recognizing unseen Chinese character classes is not as good as the performance presented in [22] because the handwritten Chinese characters are much more ambiguous compared with printed Chinese characters due to the large handwriting variations.…”
Section: B Performance On Recognition Of Unseen Chinese Character CLmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For each predicted radical, a coverage based attention model [21] built in the decoder scans the entire input sequence and chooses the most relevant part to describe a segmented radical or a two-dimensional structure between radicals. Our proposed TRAN is related to our previous work [22] with two main differences: 1) [22] focused on the application of RAN on printed Chinese character recognition while this paper focuses on handwritten Chinese character recognition. It is interesting to investigate the performance of RAN on handwritten Chinese character recognition as handwritten characters are much more ambiguous due to the diversity of writing styles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus character-based recognition model is prone to overfit. Radical-based methods [16,29,30,35] convert Chinese characters to radicals as the basic class to simplify the character structure and decrease the number of classes, thus reducing the demand for training data. They are mentioned here to prove the large demand for data if we use character-based recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%