“…according to the proof of [3, Theorem 3.6] and [3,Lemma 3.5]. Note that the restriction of the diagonal automorphism, the field automorphism and the graph automorphism to N G (R 5 ) is exactly the diagonal automorphism, the field automorphism and the graph automorphism of N G (R 5 ) respectively.…”
Section: Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we consider finite exceptional types of Lie type E 6 and 2 E 6 based on the classification of their radical subgroups in [3]. We write E +1 6 (q) = E 6 (q) and E −1 6 (q) = 2 E 6 (q) for the universal versions.…”
Section: W(b)| = |Ibr(b)|mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the notation in [3], for finite groups A, B, we write A.B for an extension of A by B. If n, m are positive integers, we write n m for the direct product of m copies of cyclic groups of order n. For η ∈ {±1}, we define…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. By [15,Table 2], T 1 = (q+ε) 2 ×(q 2 −1) 2 , T 2 = (q 2 +εq+1) 3 , T 3 = ((q 2 +1)(q−ε)) 2 and T 4 = (q 2 − εq + 1) × (q 4 + q 2 + 1) are maximal tori of G. Moreover, N G (T 1 )/T 1 2 1+4…”
Section: Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in[3, Table 3]). Since there is only one defect zero character of SL 2(5) by [13, p.2], we can see that there are 8 unipotent weights afforded by R 19 and 2 unipotent weights afforded by R 21 and others afford no unipotent weights.…”
In this article, we consider the finite exceptional groups of Lie type E 6 and 2 E 6 . We prove the inductive blockwise Alperin weight condition holds for unipotent l-blocks of E ε 6 (q) if 2, 3 ∤ q, l ≥ 5.
“…according to the proof of [3, Theorem 3.6] and [3,Lemma 3.5]. Note that the restriction of the diagonal automorphism, the field automorphism and the graph automorphism to N G (R 5 ) is exactly the diagonal automorphism, the field automorphism and the graph automorphism of N G (R 5 ) respectively.…”
Section: Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we consider finite exceptional types of Lie type E 6 and 2 E 6 based on the classification of their radical subgroups in [3]. We write E +1 6 (q) = E 6 (q) and E −1 6 (q) = 2 E 6 (q) for the universal versions.…”
Section: W(b)| = |Ibr(b)|mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the notation in [3], for finite groups A, B, we write A.B for an extension of A by B. If n, m are positive integers, we write n m for the direct product of m copies of cyclic groups of order n. For η ∈ {±1}, we define…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. By [15,Table 2], T 1 = (q+ε) 2 ×(q 2 −1) 2 , T 2 = (q 2 +εq+1) 3 , T 3 = ((q 2 +1)(q−ε)) 2 and T 4 = (q 2 − εq + 1) × (q 4 + q 2 + 1) are maximal tori of G. Moreover, N G (T 1 )/T 1 2 1+4…”
Section: Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in[3, Table 3]). Since there is only one defect zero character of SL 2(5) by [13, p.2], we can see that there are 8 unipotent weights afforded by R 19 and 2 unipotent weights afforded by R 21 and others afford no unipotent weights.…”
In this article, we consider the finite exceptional groups of Lie type E 6 and 2 E 6 . We prove the inductive blockwise Alperin weight condition holds for unipotent l-blocks of E ε 6 (q) if 2, 3 ∤ q, l ≥ 5.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.