Radiocarbon Chronology of the Mesolithic, Neolithic, Aeneolithic, and Bronze Age Sites in the Trans-Urals (Russia): A General Framework

Chairkina, Natalia M.; Kuzmin, Yaroslav V.; Hodgins, Gregory W. L.

doi:10.1017/rdc.2016.49

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…К настоящему моменту в лесной и горнолесной части Зауралья с различной степенью полноты исследовано более 50-ти памятников энеолитического времени. В разные годы, но преимущественно в последнее десятилетие, получено 55 радиоуглеродных дат для 26-ти памятников [Зах, 2009;Зах и др., 2011;Матвеев и др., 2015;Мосин и др., 2014;Мосин, Страхов и др., 2017;Епимахов, Мосин, 2015;Chairkina et al, 2017;Чаиркина, Кузьмин, 2018;Шорин, Шорина, 2021) (см. таблицу).…”

Section: материалы и обсуждениеunclassified

Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

Mosin

2023

VNSUIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. At the end of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century, a generalization of all radiocarbon dates available at that time for the Eneolithic of the Trans-Urals forest and forest-steppe zone was carried out. Two stages were allocated – early and late, within the second half of the 5th – 4th millennium BC. However, an analysis of the differences be-tween the chronology of sites in the forest and forest-steppe zones was not carried out. The aim of this article is to analyze the presence of radiocarbon dates and chronological positions of Eneolithic sites in the forest zone of the Trans-Urals. Results. In the forest part of the Trans-Urals, more than 50 Eneolithic sites were studied and 55 radiocarbon dates were obtained for 26 of them. Dating of various types of archaeological sites has been carried out: sites and settlements, including peat bogs; the burial-cult site Skvortsovskaya Gora V and the cult object Koksharovsky Hill; burials; animal bones and wood tools; human bones and skulls. The results were obtained both by the traditional method (43 dates), and AMS (12 dates). Conventionally, all sites can be divided into two categories – with several dates and with single dates. Coverage categories: belonging to the early group; objects of late groups and objects that have dates of both early and late groups.Conclusion. Analysis of the presented materials showed the presence of early complexes – the second half of the 5th – the first quarter of the 4th millennium BC (12 objects), and the late ones – the second half of the 4th – the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC (8 objects). It is also necessary to note a number of sites that have both early and late dates (7 objects). Another attempt to establish the Eneolithic sites periodization according to cultural traditions (e.g. ceramic complexes differences) was not successful. Traditional for the Trans-Urals ceramic complexes: with comb simple (linear) and geometric ornamentation, false cord (Lipchinskaya), Sosnovoostrovskaya, Shuvakishskaya and Shapkulskaya, present as in the early and in late complexes.

show abstract

Section: материалы и обсуждениеunclassified

Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

Mosin

2023

VNSUIP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…145, рис. 2;Chairkina et al, 2017]. При этом границы периода весьма условны, так как в регионе не происходит резкой смены культурных типов и на каком-то этапе развития носители энеолитических традиций сосуществуют с группами населения, культура которых атрибутируется в пределах бронзового века.…”

Section: Th-century Archaeozoological Materials From the Excavationunclassified

Untitled

2018

VAAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Для этой культуры по углю, нагару и кости получено около 20 радиоуглеродных дат в диапазоне 6 500-5 300 cal. BC [Панина, 2011;2014;Чаиркина, Дубовцева, 2016;Chairkina et al, 2017]. Как правило, керамика сатыгинского типа встречается в культурных слоях совместно с другими керамическими комплексами.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Complexes with Flat-Bottomed Ceramics in the Neolithic from the Don to the Irtysh: A Chronological Aspect

Сергеевич

2020

VNSU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. The aim of the work is to analyze the chronology of Neolithic complexes containing flat-bottomed ceramics in the European part of Russia and the Ural-Siberian region, as well as an attempt to highlight patterns in the development of Neolithic Ural-Siberian cultural traditions amidst complexes with flat-bottomed ceramics of the Volga region. Results. Researches of Baraba culture of the early Neolithic of Western Siberia: Tartas-1, Ust-Tartas-1, Vengerovo-2, with radiocarbon dates 8th – 7th thousand BC made it possible to re-address the problem of complexes with flat-bottomed ceramics, especially in the Trans-Ural region and Western Siberia and, perhaps, to reconsider some established points of view. One of the first centers of the autochthonous origin of the Neolithic at the end of VIII – beginning of VII millennium BC is the Baraba cultural tradition of the West Siberian forest-steppe. Also, the autochthonous center for the origin of the Neolithic was the territory of the Northern Caspian region and the Lower Volga region in the first half of the 7th millennium BC. In the middle of the 7th millennium BC in the Volga-Urals region, due to direct migration of the population from the territory of the Aral-Caspian, an Elshan cultural tradition appears. In the second half of the 7th millennium BC the Neolithic of the Trans-Urals is being formed. Technology of Koshkino and Kozlovo cultural pottery traditions was most likely borrowed from the population of the Aral-Caspian, relations with which have been established since the Mesolithic. Conclusion. The obtained results give grounds to identify several centers of origin of the Neolithic in the territories of European Russia, the Urals and Western Siberia with flat-bottomed ceramics at the end of 8th – first half of 7th millennium BC and round-bottom ceramics in the middle of the 7th millennium BC. The oldest among them are sites of the Baraba forest-steppe.

show abstract

Radiocarbon Chronology of the Mesolithic, Neolithic, Aeneolithic, and Bronze Age Sites in the Trans-Urals (Russia): A General Framework

Cited by 9 publications

References 14 publications

Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

Chronology of the Eneolithic Sites of the Forest Trans-Urals

Untitled

Complexes with Flat-Bottomed Ceramics in the Neolithic from the Don to the Irtysh: A Chronological Aspect

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About