Radiolabeling of EGCG with 131I and biodistribution in rats

Abstract

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), is the most abundant and widely studied catechin in green tea (Camellia sinensis Theaceae). The inhibitory effects of EGCG and green tea extract on carcinogenesis in various organs in rodents have now been demonstrated over the past decade. The aim of study was to label EGCG with I-131, to determinate its structure and to evaluate its biodistribution in Wistar rats. Radiolabeling was carried out by direct electrophilic iodination method (iodogen) and yield was determined by radio thin layer chromatography (RTLC). Radiolabelling yield is determined as 89 ± 1.0%. Besides, determination of structure of iodinated molecule, serum stability, and partition coefficient experiments was performed. The structure analysis of synthesized cold 127 I-EGCG complex was assessed with LC-MS-MS and 1 H-NMR. 1 H-NMR and LC-MS-MS results of iodinated EGCG ( 127 I-EGCG) show that oxidize iodine reacts electrophilic with aromatic ring. Serum stability results showed that in vitro stability of 131 I-EGCG was quite high. It is observed that labeling percentage decreased 83 ± 2% at 24th, Partition coefficient results show that the partition coefficient of EGCG was calculated as theoretical partition coefficient = 2.04 ± 0.42 and the experimental partition coefficient of 131 I-EGCG was found as 1.46 ± 0.2. The biodistribution data shown that the maximum uptake of the radioiodinated EGCG was seen in lung and pancreas at 30 min. The blocking assay results indicated that the uptake of 131 I-EGCG in lung was not significantly change (0.25, 0.23, and 0.22%ID/g at 30, 60, and 150 min, respectively). Biodistribution data showed no significant uptake in a specific organ of the rat. Hence radiolabeled EGCG is seen in some organs (lung, liver, pancreas, kidney, etc.).

Effects of medicinal plants on radiolabeling and biodistribution of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals: A systematic review

“…In this regards, radiolabeling and biodistribution also depend on the type of tissue (64). This can be due to differences in receptors in various body tissues.…”