2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological assessment of age from epiphyseal fusion at the wrist and ankle in Southern Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the ontogenetic series examined by Gagliardi et al (2004) did not extend beyond the end of ossific fusion of the wrist (i.e., ca. 17–20 years [Ebeye et al, 2021; Soliman et al, 2022]), and the study by Brown et al (1984) did not extend beyond 24 years of age. Thus, as observed by Butaric, Buck, et al (2022), the actual growth patterns exhibited by individuals into adulthood remains poorly known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unfortunately, the ontogenetic series examined by Gagliardi et al (2004) did not extend beyond the end of ossific fusion of the wrist (i.e., ca. 17–20 years [Ebeye et al, 2021; Soliman et al, 2022]), and the study by Brown et al (1984) did not extend beyond 24 years of age. Thus, as observed by Butaric, Buck, et al (2022), the actual growth patterns exhibited by individuals into adulthood remains poorly known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The distal ulna and radius of males and females started to appear at the age of nine to 16, while the distal tibia and fibula of males started to appear at the age of nine to 17, according to Ebeye et al's assessment of anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of the distal end of bones at the wrist and ankle [ 34 ]. From the ages of 15 to 19, girls showed complete fusion, suggesting that they had consistently developed epiphyseal fusion earlier than boys.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Morphological changes ensuing within bony surfaces, and/or ossification and fusion of bones have often been employed to ascertain age-at-death of individuals. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The pelvis is of particular importance as it exhibits significant age-dependent developmental, as well as, degradative changes, allowing for age estimation across a broader age cohort. 5,9,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18] Within the pelvis, more commonly researched parameters are the pubic symphysis, and the auricular surface of the ilium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%