1982
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.1982.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological Interpretation of the Periapical Cysts and Granulomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there is no consensus about the histopathologic definition of a periapical lesion. According to Syrjanen et al (12), a periapical cyst is a lesion with proliferation of the stratified epithelium, with or without a cavity; according to Lin et al (13), a periapical cyst is a pathologic epithelium-lined cavity surrounded by fibrous connective tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no consensus about the histopathologic definition of a periapical lesion. According to Syrjanen et al (12), a periapical cyst is a lesion with proliferation of the stratified epithelium, with or without a cavity; according to Lin et al (13), a periapical cyst is a pathologic epithelium-lined cavity surrounded by fibrous connective tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radicular cysts appear as round or pear-shaped unilocular radiolucent lesions surrounded by a thin radiopaque margin, extending from the lamina dura of the involved tooth and may displace adjacent teeth or cause mild root resorption. A lesion larger than 2 cm is more likely to be a cyst than a granuloma 4,6,7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was performed on cadavers and/or used simulated tissue for X-ray exposure (Trope et The study is a narrative review (Hamood, 2001) (Lin, L. M., Huang and Rosenberg, 2007) [64,65] The study does not contain information that could be linked to the reviewed subject The study did not differentiate between OPG, CBCT or periapical X-ray when performing the imaging analysis and its correlation to the histological status (Croitoru et al, 2016) (Syrjänen et al, 1982) [73,74] Table 2. Brief description of the included studies.…”
Section: Reason For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%