2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric stability assessment of an airborne photogrammetric sensor in a test field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vicarious calibration methods are often used to produce a new set of radiometric calibration coefficients to replace those derived in the laboratory [6], [7]. For airborne hyperspectral sensors, a feasible vicarious calibration method is reflectance-based test site calibration [8], [9]. To perform a test site calibration for airborne hyperspectral sensors, portable or permanent reference reflectance targets must be deployed over the test sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vicarious calibration methods are often used to produce a new set of radiometric calibration coefficients to replace those derived in the laboratory [6], [7]. For airborne hyperspectral sensors, a feasible vicarious calibration method is reflectance-based test site calibration [8], [9]. To perform a test site calibration for airborne hyperspectral sensors, portable or permanent reference reflectance targets must be deployed over the test sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the non‐saturated cases the R 2 ‐values of linear regression were over 0·993 for all channels. The vicarious radiometric calibration was calculated with different settings and the radiometric stability of the system was assessed by evaluating the fit of the calibration parameters obtained for one setting with another setting (details are given by Markelin et al, 2010b). The difference in R, G and B channels was on average 2·9 to 4·3 % for same day and same f‐number data, 3·5 to 4·5 % for same day and different f‐number data and 3·1 to 5·2 % for data collected on different days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By imaging system it is meant the data collection system (Honkavaara, 2008). This paper will be concerned mainly with the geometric aspects, since the analysis of radiometric performance has already been presented for the most part by Markelin et al (2010b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targets with a large reflectance range, 0.03-0.90, are desirable, but, for example in photogrammetric applications and systems, a reflectance of 0.50 is often the upper limit, while from the point of view of atmospheric correction a reflectance of at least 0.30 is desired. Recent evaluations have shown that it is preferable to have several reflectance steps to characterize system radiometry over the entire dynamic rage (for example, 0.05, 0.20, 0.30, and 0.50) [28,29]. 3.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%