2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl085098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric Stability Validation of 17 Years of AIRS Data Using Sea Surface Temperatures

Abstract: We evaluate the stability of the radiometric calibration of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) by analyzing the trend in the time series of the difference between the brightness temperatures measured in the 1,231‐cm−1 atmospheric window channel, corrected for atmospheric transmission, relative to the Real‐Time Global Sea Surface Temperature (RTGSST) for oceans between 30S and 30N. The observed bias relative to the RTGSST between 2002 and 2019 was less than 250 mK, with a 2–3‐mK/yr trend. Establishing the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the Aqua spacecraft drifts away from the A-Train, 1:30 PM mean local crossing time, additional data valuable to weather and process studies are expected to be acquired for another 3 to 4 years. The AIRS radiances at the 1231 cm -1 window channel show excellent stability relative to independent SST estimates, with a drift of less than 0.2-0.3 mK/decade, from 2002 to 2019 [13]. Using retrievals of trace gases from AIRS compared to in situ measurements allows the estimation of radiance trends of several AIRS channels to as good as 0.02-0.03 mK/decade [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the Aqua spacecraft drifts away from the A-Train, 1:30 PM mean local crossing time, additional data valuable to weather and process studies are expected to be acquired for another 3 to 4 years. The AIRS radiances at the 1231 cm -1 window channel show excellent stability relative to independent SST estimates, with a drift of less than 0.2-0.3 mK/decade, from 2002 to 2019 [13]. Using retrievals of trace gases from AIRS compared to in situ measurements allows the estimation of radiance trends of several AIRS channels to as good as 0.02-0.03 mK/decade [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Rigorous quantification of the uncertainties relative to SI standards will enable the benchmarking of the AIRS radiances, enabling trends over long periods, in the event of a break in continuity of similar IR sounder measurements.The AIRS instrument meets the three primary elements identified in the Guidelines for Radiometric Calibration of Electro-Optical Instruments for Remote Sensing [24] as the foundation of an effective calibration: (1) traceability, (2) measurement uncertainty, and (3) verification and validation. Verification and validation of AIRS Level 1B radiances using vicarious calibration of the Earth scene can be found in the literature [13,14]. The SI-traceability, as defined in the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM) the Vocabulaire international de métrologie (VIM) [25] and the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty of Measurement (GUM) [26], requires an unbroken chain of calibrations, each contributing measurement uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study (Aumann et al, 2019) addressed the stability of a single AIRS channel by comparisons to sea surface temperatures (SSTs). Some limitations of that study are ad-L. L. Strow and S. DeSouza-Machado: AIRS stability dressed below, but its major limitation is that it evaluates only one channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some limitations of that study are ad-L. L. Strow and S. DeSouza-Machado: AIRS stability dressed below, but its major limitation is that it evaluates only one channel. AIRS retrievals use 400+ AIRS channels, and there is no guarantee that the AIRS stability in one channel applies to all channels, as acknowledged in Aumann et al (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall the excellent agreement of these two extremely independent assessments (CO 2 versus SST) to within 0.02K/decade is very encouraging given the complexity of the CO 2 measurement and the uncertainties in the SST product trends. Aumann (Aumann et al, 2019) recently compared the 1231 cm -1 AIRS channel trends to RTGSST, a precursor to OISST.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%