2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03838-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomics approach with deep learning for predicting T4 obstructive colorectal cancer using CT image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, labeling a lesion with a rectangle is more efficient and time-saving for physicians responsible for labeling. Pan et al segmented tumors for invasion evaluation by two clinicians with the ROI and the dilated region of interest (dROI) to input the data into a deep learning model and achieved an AUC value of 0.947 in the T4 and non-T4 (NT4) classification [ 30 ]. Huang et al performed tumor segmentation via manually delineating the ROI along the outline of the visible tumor in the largest three continuous cross-sectional images using 3D Slicer software (version 4.3), and the radiomics signature demonstrated a discriminative performance for high-grade and low-grade CRC, with an AUC of 0.812 in the training dataset and 0.735 in the validation dataset [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, labeling a lesion with a rectangle is more efficient and time-saving for physicians responsible for labeling. Pan et al segmented tumors for invasion evaluation by two clinicians with the ROI and the dilated region of interest (dROI) to input the data into a deep learning model and achieved an AUC value of 0.947 in the T4 and non-T4 (NT4) classification [ 30 ]. Huang et al performed tumor segmentation via manually delineating the ROI along the outline of the visible tumor in the largest three continuous cross-sectional images using 3D Slicer software (version 4.3), and the radiomics signature demonstrated a discriminative performance for high-grade and low-grade CRC, with an AUC of 0.812 in the training dataset and 0.735 in the validation dataset [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%