1986
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-59-700-325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radionuclide venography: imaging monitor in deep-vein thrombosis of the pelvis and lower extremities

Abstract: Seventy-four adults with documented deep-vein thrombosis of the pelvis and/or lower extremities had baseline and follow-up radionuclide venography (RNV), giving a total of 171 studies. Fifty-nine of the patients had unilateral venous thrombosis, of which 36 (61.0%) involved the left side and 23 (39.0%) the right. The higher incidence in the left side was attributed to the longer and more horizontal course of the left common iliac vein, as well as to compression by the right iliac artery and inguinal ligament. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12] It is, however, invasive and expensive, often uncomfortable, not uniformly available, and not without morbidity; 9,[12][13][14] it also requires the services of experienced radiologists. 11,15 Because of these disadvantages, several non-invasive methods have been developed during the past decade, including 99 mTc-MAA ascending radionuclide venography, 16 125 I-fibrinogen test, 17,18 123 I-fibrinogen scintigraphy, 19 large-volume 99 mTc-pertechnetate radionuclide venography, 20,21 blood-pool radionuclide venography, [22][23][24][25][26] Doppler ultrasound, [27][28][29][30][31] real-time ultrasound, 32-39 impedance plethysmography, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and combined impedance plethysmography and 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning. 49,5 o All of these have their limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] It is, however, invasive and expensive, often uncomfortable, not uniformly available, and not without morbidity; 9,[12][13][14] it also requires the services of experienced radiologists. 11,15 Because of these disadvantages, several non-invasive methods have been developed during the past decade, including 99 mTc-MAA ascending radionuclide venography, 16 125 I-fibrinogen test, 17,18 123 I-fibrinogen scintigraphy, 19 large-volume 99 mTc-pertechnetate radionuclide venography, 20,21 blood-pool radionuclide venography, [22][23][24][25][26] Doppler ultrasound, [27][28][29][30][31] real-time ultrasound, 32-39 impedance plethysmography, [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and combined impedance plethysmography and 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning. 49,5 o All of these have their limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%