1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(96)80002-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiopharmaceutical-related pitfalls and artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If unknown, such factors may lead to poor visualization, a requirement to repeat the procedure resulting in unnecessary irradiation of organs or even misdiagnosis (Hojelse et al, 1994;Hung et al, 1996;Saha, 1998). Knowledge of altered bioavailability of the radiopharmaceuticals due to drug interaction definitely helps the physician to avoid misinterpretation of the scintigraphic images and, thus, an incorrect diagnosis and helps to prevent or treat adequately possible adverse reactions to the radiopharmaceuticals (Hladik et al, 1987;Sampson, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If unknown, such factors may lead to poor visualization, a requirement to repeat the procedure resulting in unnecessary irradiation of organs or even misdiagnosis (Hojelse et al, 1994;Hung et al, 1996;Saha, 1998). Knowledge of altered bioavailability of the radiopharmaceuticals due to drug interaction definitely helps the physician to avoid misinterpretation of the scintigraphic images and, thus, an incorrect diagnosis and helps to prevent or treat adequately possible adverse reactions to the radiopharmaceuticals (Hladik et al, 1987;Sampson, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have been studying the drug interaction as an important factor that can alter the behavior of the radiopharmaceuticals in different organs and tissues of the animal models (Owunwanne et al, 1998;Mattos et al, 1999;Xavier Holanda et al, 2002;Amorim et al, 2003;Britto et al 2004;. Frequently, this phenomenon is responsible for modification of the bioavailability of the radiopharmaceutical (Owunwanne et al, 1995;Hung et al, 1996;Xavier Holanda et al, 2002;Gomes et al, 2002). Thus, the nuclear medicine practices have increased continually in recent decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant difference in RCP values between the Cardiolite preparations and its generic medicine, the Stamicis preparation, is not easy to explain. However, the use of highdissolved-oxygen standard saline has been described as an artifact in the stability of radiopharmaceuticals because dissolved oxygen promotes formation of peroxide and hydroperoxy radicals (23). Thus, a greater dilution volume with standard saline for the Stamicis preparations compared with Cardiolite might be an explanation for the higher RCP failure rate observed with Stamicis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Over the years, their review has proved to be an extremely useful reference in nuclear medicine practice. The present review does not seek to cover the same ground, as much of the material remains relevant and the main points are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: N 1996 Joseph Hung James Ponto and Richardmentioning
confidence: 99%