2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00264-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: evaluating quality of life and treatment outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
54
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][12][13][14][15][30][31][32] The effect of the latency period after SRS in our study is comparable with the findings in previously reported series. 8,17,22,23,29,31 Interestingly, patients with previous surgery seem to be more frequently late responders to GKS than patients with no history of previous surgery. Our excellent and good outcome rates are comparable to those reported in previously published studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][12][13][14][15][30][31][32] The effect of the latency period after SRS in our study is comparable with the findings in previously reported series. 8,17,22,23,29,31 Interestingly, patients with previous surgery seem to be more frequently late responders to GKS than patients with no history of previous surgery. Our excellent and good outcome rates are comparable to those reported in previously published studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,16 Numerous authors have reported on SRS with the GK, and outcome and complication rates have been variable. [1][2][3][4][5][6]8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The observed variation in success rates in the literature may be explained by the subjectivity of assessing pain (which is the most important outcome parameter in these studies), the multifactorial causes of TN (idiopathic or secondary to a pathological entity), the significantly varying stereotactic radiosurgical treatment protocols (different anatomical targets and different radiation doses), and the usage of illdefined and widely variable outcome assessment criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors did not found influence of atypical neuralgia on pain improvement (Aubuchon, 2010;Petit, 2003;Pollock, 2002;Regís, 2009;Sheehan, 2005). No publications informing better results in patients with atypical facial pain were found.…”
Section: Pain Distributionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Han (Han, 2009), Sheehan (Sheehan, 2005), Regis (Regís, 2006) and Towk (Tawk, 2005) conversely described worse results in younger patients. In spite of these controversial results, the majority of authors have not found significant influence of the patient age in pain control (Aubuchon, 2010;Azar, 2009;Brisman, 2004;Dellaretti, 2008;Hayashi, 2009;Little, 2008;Longhi, 2007;Massager, 2007a;Park, 2011;Petit, 2003;Riesenburger, 2010;Rogers, 2000;Young, 1998). It seems that age is not a prognostic factor with "reasonable agreement".…”
Section: Clinical Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,25 However, patients undergoing GKRS have better response rates if they have not undergone a prior surgical intervention. 23 Studies on the GKRS doses used for TN have reported that doses ≥ 70 Gy provide better pain control than doses < 70 Gy. Doses over 100 Gy are likely to result in trigeminal nerve necrosis.…”
Section: 15mentioning
confidence: 99%