1988
DOI: 10.1016/1359-0189(88)90217-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radon monitoring for short term exposures in indoor air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radon monitor used in this work was an envelope-type [4] passive dosemeter. Its principle of operation is based on the exposure of bare track detector material in air.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The radon monitor used in this work was an envelope-type [4] passive dosemeter. Its principle of operation is based on the exposure of bare track detector material in air.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the exposure period, the LR-115 sheets were chemically etched in 2.5 .V NaOH solution at 60 °C for 110 min and then spark counted [5]. The radon concentrations were calculated using the sensitivity coefficient of e = 2.03 ± 0.07 tracks cm-2 per kBq h nr3 determined separately, following a calibration exposure in a radon chamber [4].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The passive radon samplers used in this study were the envelopetype radon monitors described previously [5,6]. The monitor con sists of a commercially available bare LR-115 Type II (Kodak-Pathé, Sevran, France) damage track detector with an area of 90 x 120 mm.…”
Section: Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the exposure periods, the LR-115 sheets were chemically etched in 2.5 M sodium hydroxide solution at 60°C for 110 min and then spark counted. The radon concentrations were calculated using the sensitivity coefficient of s = 2.03 ± 0.07 tracks-crrr2 perkBq-h-m~3 determined separately with a calibration exposure in a radon cham ber [5], KARGER. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%