“…To illustrate the superiority of our method, we compare our framework called as Light-weight Real-time FTI-FDet (LR FTI-FDet) with traditional detectors (Cascade detector with local binary pattern (LBP) [15], FAMRF + EHF [15], histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) + Adaboost + SVM [35]), one-stage detectors (YOLOv3 [19], SSD [20], RefineDet [22], RON [21], DSOD), two-stage detectors (Faster R-CNN [5], MLKP [24], R-FCN [6], Cascade R-CNN [25], FTI-FDet [7], Light FTI-FDet [4]), and light-weight detectors (MobileNetV2-SSD [11], MobileNetV2-SSDLite [11], ShuffleNetV2-SSD [26], Tiny-DSOD [28], Pelee [29]). In addition, we compare RFDNet-SSD with all above methods to discuss the performance of RFDNet and depthwise separable Conv.-based networks (e.g.…”