2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall–runoff modeling in a small hyper-arid catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…by Pilgrim et al (1988), Gheith and Sultan (2002), Foody et al (2004), Morin (2006) and Bahat et al (2009). Runoff generation is dominated by infiltration excess rather than saturation excess.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…by Pilgrim et al (1988), Gheith and Sultan (2002), Foody et al (2004), Morin (2006) and Bahat et al (2009). Runoff generation is dominated by infiltration excess rather than saturation excess.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The role of rainfall variability is even greater in climate regimes where a substantial portion of rainfall is convective and runoff is sensitive to this type of rainfall (Morin and Yakir, 2014;Rozalis et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2000;Yakir and Morin, 2011). The hydrological response was found to be sensitive to rainfall spatial variability in very small catchments (less than 1 km 2 ; Bahat et al, 2009), in catchments of few dozen km 2 (Zoccatelli et al, 2011) and larger catchments (> 100 km 2 ; Arnaud et al, 2011). It is therefore essential to use rainfall data with high spatial and temporal resolution Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has been demonstrated by several hydrological studies: Singh (1997) discussed how the spatial and temporal variability of rainfall affects the runoff hydrograph and peak discharge; Arnaud et al (2011) indicated that large catchments, on the scale of hundreds of square kilometers, are more sensitive than small catchments to uncertainties resulting from not considering the spatial variability of the rainfall; Zoccatelli et al (2011) pointed out that the catchment response is sensitive to the rainfall's spatial variability, even for small catchment sizes (a few dozen square kilometers), and that neglecting the spatial variability would affect runoff timing; Rozalis et al (2010) established a hydrological model for flash-flood prediction and found it to be very sensitive to the temporal variability of the rainfall, affecting both runoff amount and peak discharge; Faures et al (1995) indicated that knowing the spatial variability of convective rainfall is essential, even for catchments of very small scale (less than a few square kilometers) when conducting hydrological modeling; Bahat et al (2009) found that rainfall uncertainty dominates uncertainties in runoff prediction for a catchment smaller than 1 km 2 ; Berne et al (2004) found that hydrological applications for urban catchments of the order of few square km require a high resolution of temporal (3-5 min) and spatial (2-3 km) rainfall data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%