2017
DOI: 10.1353/pla.2017.0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising the Library’s Impact Factor: A Case Study in Scholarly Publishing Literacy for Graduate Students

Abstract: Graduate students across disciplines feel pressure to publish their scholarship, but they are often unsure how to go about it, partly due to a lack of explicit training in this area. This article discusses the collaborative development of a semester-long Publishing Academy, designed to promote knowledge of scholarly publishing and increase the library's impact within the graduate student community. Demonstrating how librarians can draw on their unique skills to build a niche service addressing unmet needs on c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework most notably includes scholarly communication practices "Scholarship as Conversation. McClellan et al (2017) demonstrate this in creating scholarly publishing information literacy training for graduate (and postgraduate students). The ACRL framework lays out the foundation skills for undergraduate and skills that doctoral students will have prior to entering a PhD program.…”
Section: Role Of Librariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The framework most notably includes scholarly communication practices "Scholarship as Conversation. McClellan et al (2017) demonstrate this in creating scholarly publishing information literacy training for graduate (and postgraduate students). The ACRL framework lays out the foundation skills for undergraduate and skills that doctoral students will have prior to entering a PhD program.…”
Section: Role Of Librariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, these assessments are generally perception based and ask students to assess their own learning and growth without actually evaluating their understanding firsthand. Similarly, while McClellan et al (2017) used pre-tests and post-tests to assess learning in their publishing academy for graduate students, test questions were still perception based, asking students to identify the level at which they are familiar with assessing journals, OA publishing, and other topics before and after the course. Fraser Riehle and Hensley's (2017) mixed methods approach assesses undergraduate student knowledge of scholarly communication concepts generally and is not tied to a specific journal publication.…”
Section: Curriculum To Support Undergraduate Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reviewing what other academic libraries had offered in this area (McClellan, Detmering, Martinez, & Johnson, 2017;Nova Southeastern University Libraries, 2017;University of Nevada, Las Vegas Libraries, n.d.), the committee decided on a single-day format that would feature both experts from within UNR as well as representatives from academic journal and book publishers. This article will discuss the details of planning and executing the event as well as the challenges, takeaways, and future considerations for improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%