1987
DOI: 10.1109/edl.1987.26532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAM cell recovery mechanisms following high-energy ion strikes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the particle with LET well below the upset threshold causes a significant voltage transient on SET at the struck drain. Whether an observable SEU occurs depends on which happens faster: the feedback of the voltage transient through the opposite inverter, or recovery of the struck node voltage as the single-event current dies out [58], [76], [77]. Note that drift (including funneling effects) is responsible for the rapid initial flip of the cell, while long-term charge collection by diffusion prolongs the recovery process; both mechanisms are critical to the upset process.…”
Section: B Seu Mechanisms In Sramsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even the particle with LET well below the upset threshold causes a significant voltage transient on SET at the struck drain. Whether an observable SEU occurs depends on which happens faster: the feedback of the voltage transient through the opposite inverter, or recovery of the struck node voltage as the single-event current dies out [58], [76], [77]. Note that drift (including funneling effects) is responsible for the rapid initial flip of the cell, while long-term charge collection by diffusion prolongs the recovery process; both mechanisms are critical to the upset process.…”
Section: B Seu Mechanisms In Sramsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From a technology standpoint, the recovery time depends on the restoring transistor current drive and minority carrier lifetimes in the substrate [76], [77]. The cell feedback time is simply the time required for the disturbed node voltage to feed back through the cross-coupled inverters and latch the struck device in its disturbed state.…”
Section: B Seu Mechanisms In Sramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a nonhardened cell with low restoring transistor drive, a short current pulse may be more detrimental. The interplay between the struck device and the external circuitry is thus of primary importance to determining cell upset characteristics [33]. This underscores the need to include external circuitry and loading effects in simulations if SEU sensitivity, and not just charge collection, is to be addressed.…”
Section: Passive Loading Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The actual response will depend on the details of the SRAM cell, particularly gate and drain capacitances, the feedback resistance in resistively-hardened cells, and the current drive of the restoring transistor. SEU ultimately results when the recovery time of the cell (time required for the struck node to recover to near its pre-strike value) exceeds the feedback time (time required for the disturbed node potential to feed back into the struck node and become latched as incorrect data) [33]. In a cell hardened by increasing the feedback time (e.g.. resistive hardening).…”
Section: Passive Loading Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%