1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.1937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman study of free-standing porous silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] In addition to this, Raman scattering experiments have been used in numerous studies of the vibrational properties of silicon nanostructures. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In many of these studies it is found that the first-order peak due to the transverse optical (TO) phonon at the point is broadened and its maximum shifted to lower energies. The phononconfinement model 6,17 attributes this behavior to the fact that in nanostructures more vibrational modes can become Raman active than in bulk crystals since the translational symmetry is broken and consequently no k = 0 selection rule applies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] In addition to this, Raman scattering experiments have been used in numerous studies of the vibrational properties of silicon nanostructures. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In many of these studies it is found that the first-order peak due to the transverse optical (TO) phonon at the point is broadened and its maximum shifted to lower energies. The phononconfinement model 6,17 attributes this behavior to the fact that in nanostructures more vibrational modes can become Raman active than in bulk crystals since the translational symmetry is broken and consequently no k = 0 selection rule applies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that the 630 cm~1 line in PS is a consequence of the combination of the LO(X) and TA(X) modes. The enhancement of this mode in the PS is due to the relaxation of selection rules and surface assistance, as suggested by Tanino et al 12 However, the contribution of an bending mode to this Raman line SiH 2 should not be disregarded since we observe the SiH 2 stretching mode in the Raman spectra of the PS layer (see the inset in Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Many researchers have reported polarization e †ects in the Raman spectra of PS layers,10h13 but in general the results are controversial. However, the anisotropic behaviour of second-order Raman scattering in PS has not been treated in the literature except for the work of Tanino et al 12 The photoluminescence spectra of PS layers present a strong dependence on the nature of the PS substrate.9 Therefore, the PL spectra of PS should contain information regarding the structure and bonding on PS layers. Since PL and Raman spectroscopy are governed by di †erent selection rules, it is believed that a simultaneous study of the polarization e †ects on the Raman and PL spectra of PS layers can provide a better understanding of structural, bonding and anisotropic properties of this material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 and 11 indicate reduction of the phonon scattering rate for electrons confined in nc-Si dots. As the average diameter of nc-Si dots is about 4 nm [12], [16] the energies of a confined electron are well separated due to quantum effect. For scattering process mediated by high-frequency phonons, the discrete nature of the energy spectrum of electrons and confined optical phonons reduces the number of allowed transitions, during which the energy conservation must hold.…”
Section: A Possible Mechanism Of Suppressed Electron Energy Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(b) shows the calculated dwell time as a function of the electron energy in direction to a linear chain of quantum dots , where the total electron energy is given by the sum of and the electron energy perpendicular to a linear chain, that is, . Based on structural and optical studies of the PS diodes [12], [16] the size of the silicon dots were assumed to be 4.0 nm, and the oxide thickness and the barrier height were set 1.0 nm and 1.0 eV, respectively. The voltage across each dot was set 0.1 V, which is a typical value under device operation.…”
Section: A Possible Mechanism Of Suppressed Electron Energy Relamentioning
confidence: 99%