2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/vtcfall.2019.8891584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAN Slicing in Multi-CU/DU Architecture for 5G Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Towards an efficient RAN slicing, currently, some of the radio processing functionalities of a next-generation NodeB (gNB) in the NG-RAN are accommodated as VNFs [110], namely the centralized unit (CU) and distributed unit (DU), and some others are distributed as physical network function (PNF), namely the radio unit (RU). The VNFs run on points of presence (PoPs) [111], while the PNFs are implemented on dedicated hardware in the cellular network sites.…”
Section: ) Softwarization and Virtualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Towards an efficient RAN slicing, currently, some of the radio processing functionalities of a next-generation NodeB (gNB) in the NG-RAN are accommodated as VNFs [110], namely the centralized unit (CU) and distributed unit (DU), and some others are distributed as physical network function (PNF), namely the radio unit (RU). The VNFs run on points of presence (PoPs) [111], while the PNFs are implemented on dedicated hardware in the cellular network sites.…”
Section: ) Softwarization and Virtualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the function split in the NG-RAN, the current distribution of the radio processing functions over gNB components is executed statically without taking into consideration the type of RAN slices. When supporting a large amount RAN slices in types of eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC, the one-size-fits-all function splitting architecture in NG-RAN is not efficient in terms of resource allocation and network performance [110]. We strongly believe that a customized and dynamic distribution of the gNB functionalities is needed in order to satisfy the service requirements of the three aforementioned types of RAN slices in future networks.…”
Section: ) Softwarization and Virtualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Towards an efficient RAN slicing, currently, some of the radio processing functionalities of a next-generation NodeB (gNB) in the NG-RAN are accommodated as VNFs [100], namely the centralized unit (CU) and distributed unit (DU), and some others are distributed as physical network function (PNF), namely the radio unit (RU). The VNFs run on points of presence (PoPs) [101], while the PNFs are implemented on dedicated hardware in the cellular network sites.…”
Section: ) Softwarization and Virtualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the function split in the NG-RAN, the current distribution of the radio processing functions over gNB components is executed statically without taking into consideration the type of RAN slices. When supporting a large amount RAN slices in types of eMBB, URLLC, and mMTC, the one-size-fits-all function splitting architecture in NG-RAN is not efficient in terms of resource allocation and network performance [100]. We strongly believe that a customized and dynamic distribution of the gNB functionalities is needed in order to satisfy the service requirements of the three aforementioned types of RAN slices in future networks.…”
Section: ) Softwarization and Virtualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the evolution of RAN to address the rapid growth of fronthaul traffic and the stringent requirement of latency, more flexible RAN architectures such as NG-RAN have been analyzed. Reference [22] proposed a resource allocation policy for RAN slicing in Multi-CU/DU architectures, the result showed that the proposed method reached the satisfactory performance and guaranteed the isolation between slices. The effective management strategy for the agile DU-CU deployment was investigated in terms of power consumption in [23], a mixed ILP model and a graph-based heuristic method was proposed to optimize the consumption of reconfigurable add/drop multiplexer, Ethernet switch, optical transponder and so on.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%