2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-018-1465-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RANCM: a new ranking scheme for assigning confidence levels to metabolite assignments in NMR-based metabolomics studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabolite identifications were confirmed using the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB) [ 41 ] and the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) [ 42 45 ]. If a metabolite was considered to be present in the spectra, a concentration was recorded and identity was further confirmed using 2D spectra and ranked according to an ordinal ranking system developed in our laboratory [ 46 ]. The ranking system can be used to assign confidence levels to all metabolite identifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metabolite identifications were confirmed using the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB) [ 41 ] and the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) [ 42 45 ]. If a metabolite was considered to be present in the spectra, a concentration was recorded and identity was further confirmed using 2D spectra and ranked according to an ordinal ranking system developed in our laboratory [ 46 ]. The ranking system can be used to assign confidence levels to all metabolite identifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rank levels range from 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest confidence and 5 being the highest confidence in the metabolite identification. Assignment of rank levels of confidence to metabolite identifications is guided by a detailed decision tree as previously described [ 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is worth discussing how important the contribution of the f1 trace comparison (multiplicity and coupling constants) is for the JRES-STOCSY and database hit, toward the assignment of confidence levels (ranks) when performing the putative annotation of a compound, in relation to the recently reported recommendations from the group of Kennedy (RANCM). 40 While the decision tree proposed by RANCM includes a differentiation for "singlets only" versus multiplets when analyzing a 1D 1 H spectral set, the use of the JRES-STOCSY projections gives equal importance to any type of multiplet. In addition, RANCM specifically excludes the use of STOCSY in its flowchart, which means that the mere presence of a peak at a chemical shift might confound annotation at tier 1 levels.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional NMR data were analyzed using the COLMAR software [70,71] () to confirm metabolite assignments. The confidence in metabolite assignments was ranked using the RANCM scheme developed in our laboratory [72].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%