2014 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation 2014
DOI: 10.1109/isms.2014.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Forest and Filter Bank Common Spatial Patterns for EEG-Based Motor Imagery Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For classification, we use Random Forests (RF) classifiers [34] which are resistant to over-fitting even at low trials-to-features ratio, robust to outliers, and capable to build a complex model for capturing non-linear relationships while running in (near) real-time. RF classifiers have been recently applied successfully in decoding EEG signals for both classification [35]- [37] and data mining purposes [38] as well as in other fields of science such as data mining [39], gene analysis [40] and computer vision [41]- [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For classification, we use Random Forests (RF) classifiers [34] which are resistant to over-fitting even at low trials-to-features ratio, robust to outliers, and capable to build a complex model for capturing non-linear relationships while running in (near) real-time. RF classifiers have been recently applied successfully in decoding EEG signals for both classification [35]- [37] and data mining purposes [38] as well as in other fields of science such as data mining [39], gene analysis [40] and computer vision [41]- [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we show the feasibility of applying the random forest algorithm [24] to single-trial source-localized time-frequency data. With its non-parametric, non-linear approach and its capability to handle high dimensional datasets with highly correlated predictors, this method is well suited for MEG data (also see [33,34,35,36]) and can detect subtle differences concealed in the averaged data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamma band activity was estimated using frequency smoothing (Slepian sequence multi taper approach), yielding 20 Hz-wide frequency bands centered at 35,65,85,115 and 135 Hz. The power was calculated separately for 250 ms long time windows from −500 to 1000 ms and the post-stimulus activity was then expressed as relative change to baseline power.…”
Section: Source Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This weighting improves separability, and therefore, in general, also accuracy of SMR-BCIs. Although fi rst works on the combination of CSP fi ltering and RF classifi ers are available [2,5] , a direct comparison with the common LDA classifi er on CSP fi ltered features is missing. We performed a BCI simulation with the data of the online SMR-BCI to provide such a comparison.…”
Section: Bci Simulation: Random Forest Vs Regularized Ldamentioning
confidence: 99%