2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.79.066118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random hypergraphs and their applications

Abstract: In the last few years we have witnessed the emergence, primarily in online communities, of new types of social networks that require for their representation more complex graph structures than have been employed in the past. One example is the folksonomy, a tripartite structure of users, resources, and tags-labels collaboratively applied by the users to the resources in order to impart meaningful structure on an otherwise undifferentiated database. Here we propose a mathematical model of such tripartite struct… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
178
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
178
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we use the tripartite hypergraph representation given by Ref. [21], where a hyperedge simply consists of one user, one resource and one tag. Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Tripartite Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use the tripartite hypergraph representation given by Ref. [21], where a hyperedge simply consists of one user, one resource and one tag. Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Tripartite Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such application is a folksonomy, a social network in which users can annotate items with different tags [11]. In this application, the graph consists of nodes corresponding to different users, different items, and different tags.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the two pure algorithms might reduce some information of social tagging networks. The hypergraph theory [Ghoshal et al, 2009;] is expected to harness the whole network structure without losing any information and thus provide a promising way to obtain better recommendation performance.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%