2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2016.7869603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random matrix improved community detection in heterogeneous networks

Abstract: Abstract-This article proposes a new spectral method for community detection in large dense networks following the degree-corrected stochastic block model. We theoretically support and analyze an approach based on a novel "α-regularization" of the modularity matrix. We provide a consistent estimator for the choice of α inducing the most favorable community detection in worst case scenarios. We further prove that spectral clustering ought to be performed on a 1 − α regularization of the dominant eigenvectors (r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ali & Couillet (2018), the authors studied the existence of an optimal value α opt of the parameter α for community detection methods based on D −α AD −α . Recall that our SRSC and CRSC are designed based on…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ali & Couillet (2018), the authors studied the existence of an optimal value α opt of the parameter α for community detection methods based on D −α AD −α . Recall that our SRSC and CRSC are designed based on…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unsolved that whether there exists optimal parameter τ both theoretically and numerically. In [2], the authors studied the existence of an optimal value α opt of the parameter α for community detection methods based on D −α AD −α for community detection problem. Recall that our Mixed-ISC is designed based on…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider an undirected, unweighted, no-self-loop network N and assume that there are K disjoint blocks C (1) , C (2) , . .…”
Section: Settings and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guarantees independent of the coherence can be obtained for more advanced sampling methods. Perhaps the most well known method is that of leverage scores, where one draws m samples independently by selecting (with replacement) the i-th column with probability p i = V k (i, :) 2 2 /k, called leverage scores. Theorem 3.2 (Lemma 5 for q = 1 in [54]).…”
Section: Nyström-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us denote by D the diagonal degree matrix such that D(i, i) = ∑ j W(i, j) is the (weighted) degree of node i. We define the combinatorial graph Laplacian matrix L = D − W, the normalized graph Laplacian matrix L n = I − D −1/2 WD −1/2 , and the random walk Laplacian L rw = I − D −1 W. Other popular choices include 3 the non-backtracking matrix [73], degree-corrected versions of the modularity matrix [2], the Bethe-Hessian matrix [114] or similar deformed Laplacians [34].…”
Section: Spectral Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%