2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random multiaxial fatigue: A comparative analysis among selected frequency and time domain fatigue evaluation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variant of the well‐known Matake criterion was proposed by the authors of Refs (see also the review in Benasciutti et al . and that by Braccesi et al …”
Section: Time Domain (Numerical Deterministic) Approaches For Multiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A variant of the well‐known Matake criterion was proposed by the authors of Refs (see also the review in Benasciutti et al . and that by Braccesi et al …”
Section: Time Domain (Numerical Deterministic) Approaches For Multiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dang Van and Papadopoulos mesoscopic approach has been extended to variable amplitude loading by Braccesi et al . An infinite life condition of fatigue limit with a probability of survival equal to 50%, that is to say, 50% probability of no failure with a repetition of N 0 load sequences of duration T .…”
Section: Time Domain (Numerical Deterministic) Approaches For Multiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When calculating the shear stress amplitude, the frequency-domain approach is faster than usual time-domain algorithms, which need to process directly a digitalized random load path. Time saving is further enhanced if the computation of the shear stress amplitude has to be repeated in thousands of nodes of a large three-dimensional finite element model [53][54][55].…”
Section: Multiaxial Loadingsmentioning
confidence: 99%