Recent Advances in Stochastic Modeling and Data Analysis 2007
DOI: 10.1142/9789812709691_0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Multivariate Multimodal Distributions

Abstract: Bayesian nonparametric inference for unimodal and multimodal random probability measures on a finite dimensional Euclidean space is examined. After a short discussion on several concepts of multivatiate unimodality, we introduce and study a new class of nonparametric prior distributions on the subspace of random multivariate multimodal distributions. This class in a way generalizes the very restrictive class of random unimodal distributions. A flexible constructional approach is developed using a variant of Kh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most common techniques include: i) the Silverman bandwidth test (Silverman 1981), which uses a normal kernel density estimate with increasing bandwidth; ii) the excess mass test proposed in (Müller and Sawitzki 1991); and iii) the Hartigan's Dip Test (Hartigan and Hartigan 1985), which has been widely adopted due to its low computational complexity, its high statistical power, and the absence of tuning parameter. The extension of these tests to multivariate distributions is not straightforward, and several definitions of unimodality have been suggested for the multidimensional setting (Paez and Walker 2018;Kouvaras and Kokolakis 2007). The Hartigan's SPAN and RUNT statistic (Hartigan and Mohanty 1992), and the MAP test (Rozál and Hartigan 1994) are often cited as multivariate alternatives, but these types of procedures are usually far more complex than univariate ones, both conceptually and computationally, relying for instance on the construction of several spamming trees (Siffer et al 2018).…”
Section: Refine: Improving the Location By Outliers Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most common techniques include: i) the Silverman bandwidth test (Silverman 1981), which uses a normal kernel density estimate with increasing bandwidth; ii) the excess mass test proposed in (Müller and Sawitzki 1991); and iii) the Hartigan's Dip Test (Hartigan and Hartigan 1985), which has been widely adopted due to its low computational complexity, its high statistical power, and the absence of tuning parameter. The extension of these tests to multivariate distributions is not straightforward, and several definitions of unimodality have been suggested for the multidimensional setting (Paez and Walker 2018;Kouvaras and Kokolakis 2007). The Hartigan's SPAN and RUNT statistic (Hartigan and Mohanty 1992), and the MAP test (Rozál and Hartigan 1994) are often cited as multivariate alternatives, but these types of procedures are usually far more complex than univariate ones, both conceptually and computationally, relying for instance on the construction of several spamming trees (Siffer et al 2018).…”
Section: Refine: Improving the Location By Outliers Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also [19] reviews the literature and introduces and discusses a new class of nonparametric prior distributions for multivariate multimodal distributions.…”
Section: Multivariate Unimodalitymentioning
confidence: 99%