2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-020-03765-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Products of Standard Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this part we will establish the remaining part of Theorem A and prove that for t sufficiently large, the map f = f t is NUH. The arguments are inspired in the abstract methods used in [CS22] (see also [Car20]), but with the additional difficulty of having to work in the natural extension instead of directly in the manifold. We rely on Proposition 2.2.…”
Section: Non-uniform Hyperbolicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part we will establish the remaining part of Theorem A and prove that for t sufficiently large, the map f = f t is NUH. The arguments are inspired in the abstract methods used in [CS22] (see also [Car20]), but with the additional difficulty of having to work in the natural extension instead of directly in the manifold. We rely on Proposition 2.2.…”
Section: Non-uniform Hyperbolicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that we gain some expansion in this good region, however there is a difficulty in the fact that the good region is not invariant, and once an orbit goes out of the good region we may loose control on the expansion which we gained. In order to deal with this problem we use ideas from [BC14], [Car20]. We consider a family of unit vectorfields inside which are Lipschitz along .…”
Section: Ideas Of the Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pursue of versatility, the result is written in some general setting. The method of the proof is based in [BC14] and its subsequent refinement [Car20].…”
Section: Bounding the Lyapunov Exponents From Belowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they restrict the fiber map f$f$ to one of some particular classes to ensure contraction or hyperbolic properties (exact or averaged) of the vertical fiber. Skew‐products with nonuniform hyperbolicity can still be studied but in a more qualitative sense [5, 12]. In contrast, our results make only mild regularity assumptions on f$f$, but require that g$g$ is uniformly expanding with large minimal expansion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%