1Bacteria with multi-replicon genome organizations, including members of the family 2 Rhizobiaceae, often carry a variety of niche-associated functions on large plasmids. 3 While evidence exists for cross-replicon interactions and co-evolution between replicons 4 in many of these systems, remarkable strain-to-strain variation is also observed for 5 extrachromosomal elements, suggesting increased genetic plasticity. Here, we show 6 that curing of the tumor-inducing virulence plasmid (pTi) of an octopine-type 7 Agrobacterium tumefaciens lineage leads to a large deletion in the co-resident At 8 megaplasmid (pAt). The deletion event is mediated by a repetitive IS-element, IS66, 9 and results in a variety of environment-dependent fitness consequences, including loss 10 of independent conjugal transfer of the plasmid. Interestingly, a related and otherwise 11 wild-type A. tumefaciens strain is missing exactly the same large pAt segment as the 12 pAt deletion derivatives, suggesting a similar event over its natural history. Overall, the 13 findings presented here uncover a novel genetic interaction between the two large 14 plasmids of A. tumefaciens and provide evidence for cross-replicon integration and co-15 evolution of these plasmids. 16 Bacteria exhibit a diversity of genomic architectures and contain replicons that range 18 from small, transient plasmids and megaplasmids, to chromids, to secondary and 19 primary chromosomes (diCenzo and Finan 2017). Primary chromosomes are the largest 20 replicons encoding core functions, whereas any replicating elements in addition to the 21 primary chromosome are defined as secondary replicons. Secondary chromosomes are 48 limitation to the coexistence of multiple replicons and have been observed in diverse 49 bacterial species, including species of Vibrio (Heidelberg et al. 2000; Ramachandran et 50 al. 2017) and Sinorhizobium (Ronson et al. 1987; Barnett et al. 2004; Bobik et al. 2006; 51 Galardini et al. 2015; Pini et al. 2015; diCenzo et al. 2018). In most cases, chromosomal 52 factors influence the regulation of secondary replicon factors, with limited regulation in 53 the opposite direction (Ronson et al. 1987; Barnett et al. 2004; Bobik et al. 2006; Agnoli 54 et al. 2012; Galardini et al. 2015; Pini et al. 2015; diCenzo et al. 2018), likely due to 55 intolerance of integral pathway perturbation and the suppression of costly accessory 56 functions required to stabilize secondary replicons. However, metabolic redundancy has 57 been observed between rhizobial replicons (GonzĂĄlez et al. 2005; diCenzo and Finan 58 2017), suggesting that favorable interaction and pathway integration between primary 59 and secondary replicons can occur. However, because the majority of organisms 60 possessing multi-partite genomes exist and transition between multiple environmental 61 reservoirs, and are often host-associated, the extent to which cross-replicon interactions 62 occur and their consequences are often not determined.63Here, we characterize a cross-replicon genetic interaction in ...