Ieee Infocom 2004
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random walks in peer-to-peer networks

Abstract: Abstract-We quantify the effectiveness of random walks for searching and construction of unstructured peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. For searching, we argue that random walks achieve improvement over flooding in the case of clustered overlay topologies and in the case of re-issuing the same request several times. For construction, we argue that an expander can be maintained dynamically with constant operations per addition. The key technical ingredient of our approach is a deep result of stochastic processes ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
355
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
355
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, different authors have proposed the use of random walk for a large variety of tasks and networks; to name but a few: querying in sensor and ad-hoc networks [18,5,1], searching in peer-to-peer networks [12], gossiping [16], PageRank and search engines on the web [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, different authors have proposed the use of random walk for a large variety of tasks and networks; to name but a few: querying in sensor and ad-hoc networks [18,5,1], searching in peer-to-peer networks [12], gossiping [16], PageRank and search engines on the web [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be used for a variety of applications such as load balancing, gathering statistics on the nodes of the skip graph and for finding highly replicated data items. It is known that in unstructured P2P systems, when the underlying graph expands there are algorithms for locating data items which are more efficient than simple flooding [6]. Furthermore, it was shown [11] that in some cases unstructured P2P systems can locate items faster than structured systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been shown [7,8] that the sample obtained with this mechanism is a good sample of the overall network. Indeed, when the network has highly connected nodes or hubs (possibly due to low or medium loads), since the collecting message follows a random walk, these hubs will be reached with higher probability than poorly connected nodes.…”
Section: Peer Samplingmentioning
confidence: 98%