1982
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.141.1.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Comparative Trial of a Ward Discussion Group

Abstract: A randomized controlled study of 38 catchment unit psychiatric in-patients in a discussion group showed no significant additional benefit compared with 36 in-patients in an activity group. Symptom change scored by three rating groups agreed closely, average r = +0.64. Patients treated with ECT showed 2.6 times as much reduction in morbidity as those not so treated, but there was still no appreciable difference between discussion and activity groups when this was allowed for. Other treatment factors and the Haw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the Hawthorne effect (i.e., "the positive effect observed in patients from the attention received in a study" 29 ) was taken into account; therefore, baseline number of episodes was calculated as the sum of the episodes during the 15 days previous to inclusion and the 15 days after inclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the Hawthorne effect (i.e., "the positive effect observed in patients from the attention received in a study" 29 ) was taken into account; therefore, baseline number of episodes was calculated as the sum of the episodes during the 15 days previous to inclusion and the 15 days after inclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hawthorne effect (the positive effect observed in patients from the attention received in a study) may come into play with trials enrolling these patients. 19 We collected the retrospective 2 week seizure count at enrollment, and to address the potential Hawthorne effect, compared it to the frequency of events in the 2 week treatment free baseline period (8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hawthorne effect (the positive effect observed in patients from the attention received in a study) may come into play with trials enrolling these patients. 19 We collected the retrospective 2 week seizure count at enrollment, and to address the potential Hawthorne effect, compared it to the frequency of events in the 2 week treatment free baseline period (8.4 and 7.5 NES). Monitoring patients for seizures and symptoms prior to receiving the intervention may be essential to look for changes, either positive or negative, from enrollment to initiation of therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%