2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00208.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized controlled trial of glove perforation in single‐ and double‐gloving in episiotomy repair after vaginal delivery

Abstract: The double-gloving method significantly reduced the risk of exposure of the surgeon's hand to the patient's blood, when compared with the single-gloving method in episiotomy repair. There were no differences in the rate of glove perforations compared to the time of operation and level of surgeon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The search yielded 6942 bibliographic records and fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria [8, 9, 18, 19, 2224, 26–28] (see Figure 1 for details). No studies were reported in multiple papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The search yielded 6942 bibliographic records and fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria [8, 9, 18, 19, 2224, 26–28] (see Figure 1 for details). No studies were reported in multiple papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the fourteen studies, ten studies evaluated the use of double gloves in preventing needle-stick injuries [8, 9, 18, 19, 2224, 26–28]. This included eight studies evaluating the use of double gloves [8, 9, 18, 19, 22, 23, 26, 28], and two studies evaluating variations of double gloving [23, 24, 27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations