2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Controlled Trial of Octyl Cyanoacrylate Skin Adhesive versus Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure after Implantable Venous Port Placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Similarly, several recent trials have demonstrated that wound closure with OCA offers comparable scar cosmesis compared to repair with sutures. [24][25][26][27][28][29] In accord with our results, a 2014 Cochrane review and meta-analysis found that wound closure with tissue adhesives resulted in significantly more episodes of wound dehiscence than sutures. 30 Strengths of this study include its use of a validated scar assessment tool by blinded observers, a priori data analysis, and larger sample size relative to similar published studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…23 Similarly, several recent trials have demonstrated that wound closure with OCA offers comparable scar cosmesis compared to repair with sutures. [24][25][26][27][28][29] In accord with our results, a 2014 Cochrane review and meta-analysis found that wound closure with tissue adhesives resulted in significantly more episodes of wound dehiscence than sutures. 30 Strengths of this study include its use of a validated scar assessment tool by blinded observers, a priori data analysis, and larger sample size relative to similar published studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Daykan et al [20] recently conducted a randomized trial and reported similar outcomes between Dermabond ® and monofilament epidermal sutures in cesarean procedures, including length of stay, closure time, closure appearance, blood loss, infections, and wound disruption. Martin et al [20] found no difference between cosmetic outcomes after closure with Dermabond ® and subcuticular sutures, although mean operative time was shorter in the Dermabond ® group (1.4 minutes vs. 8.6 minutes) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[17][18][19] A few studies that applied CSCAs as a catheter securement method have previously been carried out, all with favorable results for the use of CSCAs. [20][21][22][23] CSCAs, another term for tissue adhesives (TAs), have been recommended as a standard of practice for use with all catheter types in the 2021 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice. 24 Notably, SecurePortIV Catheter Securement Adhesive (Adhezion Biomedical) is the first and only cyanoacrylate adhesive cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for securing catheters and sealing catheter insertion sites.…”
Section: Securement Strength Of Cscasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSCAs provide efficient and secure wound closure while also protecting a wound from microbial migration 17–19. A few studies that applied CSCAs as a catheter securement method have previously been carried out, all with favorable results for the use of CSCAs 20–23. CSCAs, another term for tissue adhesives (TAs), have been recommended as a standard of practice for use with all catheter types in the 2021 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%