Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus–2 (SARS–CoV–2)–induced coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) has led to exponentially rising mortality, particularly in immunosuppressed patients, who inadequately respond to conventional COVID–19 vaccination. In this blinded randomized clinical trial (EudraCT 2021–002348–57) we compare the efficacy and safety of an additional booster vaccination with a vector versus mRNA vaccine in non–seroconverted patients. We assigned 60 patients under rituximab treatment, who did not seroconvert after their primary mRNA vaccination with either BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) or mRNA–1273 (Moderna), to receive a third dose, either using the same mRNA or the vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV–19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca). Patients were stratified according to the presence of peripheral B–cells. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference in the SARS–CoV–2 antibody seroconversion rate between vector (heterologous) and mRNA (homologous) vaccinated patients by week four. Key secondary endpoints included the overall seroconversion and cellular immune response; safety was assessed at weeks one and four.
Seroconversion rates at week four were comparable between vector (6/27 patients, 22%) and mRNA (9/28, 32%) vaccine (p=0.6). Overall, 27% of patients seroconverted; specific T–cell responses were observed in 20/20 (100%) vector versus 13/16 (81%) mRNA vaccinated patients. Newly induced humoral and/or cellular responses occurred in 9/11 (82%) patients. No serious adverse events, related to immunization, were observed. This enhanced humoral and/or cellular immune response supports an additional booster vaccination in non–seroconverted patients irrespective of a heterologous or homologous vaccination regimen.