2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2021191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range-free localization algorithms in wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To keep up with the trend, some eminent ideas have been put forward to solve tracking with WSNs [7]- [9]. Traditionally, WSNs-based localization algorithms can be divided into two categories: range-free methods and range-based methods [10]. The latter is defined by protocols that use point-to-point distance estimates (range) or angle estimates for calculating location [11], [12], and the former makes no use of such information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To keep up with the trend, some eminent ideas have been put forward to solve tracking with WSNs [7]- [9]. Traditionally, WSNs-based localization algorithms can be divided into two categories: range-free methods and range-based methods [10]. The latter is defined by protocols that use point-to-point distance estimates (range) or angle estimates for calculating location [11], [12], and the former makes no use of such information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is defined by protocols that use point-to-point distance estimates (range) or angle estimates for calculating location [11], [12], and the former makes no use of such information. Created with less range information, a range-free method, however, is more suitable for large-scale network localization applications, for the range-based one requires specific statistics and more expensive hardware or careful system calibration [10], [13], [14]. In addition, the range-free strategy has been extensively studied in many algorithms such as the RSD [15], DV-Hop [16], APIT [17], and REP [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%