2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2014.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank correlation among different statistical models in ranking of winter wheat genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cultivar selection and recommendation process, the cultivar ranking (Roostaei et al, 2014) and its compatibility across locations (Hu, 2015), are very important. This is why in this research we analyzed the Spearman rank correlation.…”
Section: Multi Environmental Trial Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cultivar selection and recommendation process, the cultivar ranking (Roostaei et al, 2014) and its compatibility across locations (Hu, 2015), are very important. This is why in this research we analyzed the Spearman rank correlation.…”
Section: Multi Environmental Trial Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohammadi et al (2010) found positive associations, and with high repeatability between years, for the WRW, AMMI, and ERd methods. Roostaei et al (2014) observed an association of medium magnitude (0.56) between the concepts of stability for AMMI and GGE. Cargnelutti Filho et al (2009), with competition trials of corn genotypes, verified total concordance (r s = 1.00) among the estimates of the PPW and WRW stability parameters, a result also obtained in this study (r s = 1.00).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Comparisons between methodologies of adaptability and stability analysis have been performed for several crops, such as corn (Bujak et al, 2014), sugarcane (Paula et al, 2014), soybean (Freitas Monteiro et al, 2015), and wheat (Roostaei et al, 2014). However, comparisons between methodologies based on linear bissegmented regression and AMMI and GGE biplot are poorly understood and require further studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is visible that the genotype PKB Talas is the closest to the beginning of the coordinates and that it exhibits the highest stability, i. Although the AMMI and GGE biplot (AMMI 2 biplot) gave similar results in identifying superior genotypes, the AMMI 2 biplot was more versatile and flexible, and provided a better understanding (Roostaei et al, 2014 (Figure 2). The AMMI model does not provide a quantitative stability measure, such a measure is essential in order to quantify and rank genotypes according to their yield stability, which is why ASV is proposed.…”
Section: Asv =mentioning
confidence: 99%